Globally, there are approximately 3.6 million neonatal deaths annually (ie, in the first 28 days of life), with 70% occurring on the first day of life [1]. Up to 10% of newborns (79,000/year in the United Kingdom and 13 million/year worldwide) require some form of resuscitation at birth, with an estimated 7 million babies worldwide requiring more advanced resuscitation [2]. The correct structured management of resuscitation in the first few “golden” minutes after birth is critical to prevent significant morbidity (eg, cerebral palsy due to hypoxia) or death. There is strong evidence that standardized resuscitation training and algorithms significantly improve newborn outcomes and could reduce mortality by up to 30% [2,3].

International newborn resuscitation guidelines highlight the importance of using the heart rate (HR) to guide resuscitation and stabilization methods [4]. However, many of the methods used to measure HR are inaccurate or technically challenging, particularly in premature infants.

When assessing the HR, practitioners always have access to a stethoscope but use other technologies less frequently [5]. HR assessment using the stethoscope, through auscultation, is inaccurate in about one-third of cases [6,7] and is not continuous; therefore, it needs to be performed every 30 seconds. As such, it is time consuming, which pauses resuscitation and can lead to errors.

This paper describes an enquiry investigating the design and use of a novel medical device developed to address the unmet need of standardizing and facilitating neonatal resuscitation. In an emergency time-critical resuscitation situation where failure can mean death of an infant, it is vital that clinicians are provided information in a timely, precise, and clear manner to support decision making. The nature of this context requires an interface that can ensure both the efficiency and reliability of staff to access the most critical information. A touchscreen interface was considered to be the best hardware solution. The work described here focuses on the development of the design requirements for a touchscreen interface that is integral to this novel medical device.

To understand the requirements of this new device, and specifically, the contributors to interface design, a human factors approach was implemented, which combined a traditional user-centered design approach with an applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA) [8]. The aim of this study was to understand not only the tasks involved but also the cognitive requirements of clinicians. This study has enabled the generation of an interface specification. In addition, the study’s findings provide points of learning to other medical device developers and clinicians, with an aim of understanding the complex requirements and information needs of clinicians during neonatal resuscitation.

Other common techniques for monitoring HR in the neonatal intensive care unit, such as electrocardiography or pulse oximetry, were not developed for resuscitation at birth. These systems are used less due to their reliability, delay in HR readings, and practical issues (eg, difficulty ensuring adhesion to the skin) [5,9].

In the delivery room, electrocardiography and pulse oximetry sensors are connected to the main monitors by cables. This can make attachment more challenging and risks cold exposure with the potential for hypothermia, which is an independent risk factor for death in premature babies [10]. Current resuscitation guidance for premature babies highlights the prevention of hypothermia, and therefore, priority is given to drying the baby’s head, putting on a hat, and placing the body (wet) in a plastic bag/wrap [11-13].

To address the issues described, a novel HR monitoring hardware solution using reflectance mode optical photoplethysmograpy, an optical sensor, has been designed. This monitor has been integrated into a single-use newborn hat, specifically for use in newborn babies requiring resuscitation. This solution aims to fit naturally into the existing care pathway, allowing wireless, hands-free, quick, continuous, and accurate HR monitoring via a touchscreen interface as well as minimizing the risk of hypothermia. The effectiveness of the solution is a combination of two features: the forehead placement, where blood flow is preserved even in babies with a low HR (the forehead blood supply comes from the carotid arteries that supply the brain), and the sensor’s patented optical arrangement and signal processing scheme, which has been proven to provide high signal quality from neonatal patients [14]. Additionally, the hat uses wireless communication, allowing greater flexibility in deployment than cable-based solutions.

The value of human factors/ergonomics (HFE) integration to medical device design and patient safety has been recognized over recent years [15-19], has gained formal recognition in standards [20-23], and is a requirement of the European Medical Devices Directive 93/42 and its 2007 amendment for obtaining Conformité Européenne approval. Concerns still remain about the quality and effectiveness of the interpretation of all relevant standards and integration of HFE within the design/development process. There appears to be a lack of “exemplar case studies” to illustrate how the design process and user-centered design can contribute to product design in health care and how HFE should be routinely implemented [24-26]. This is acknowledged with specific barriers identified within small and medium enterprises such as university spin-out companies [18].

This study contributes to the body of evidence on the application of HFE methods to the formative evaluation of this novel medical device, as required by the relevant standards [23], through a collaboration between a university spin-out company, the School of Medicine, and the Human Factors Research group in the University of Nottingham.

This study focuses specifically on understanding human-computer interactions and user requirements for the computer interface of the device. The aims were (1) to identify gaps in existing knowledge on user requirements for the interface design of a novel resuscitation device and (2) to represent the key design requirements to promote usability of the touchscreen interface of the device.

The critical characteristics of a neonatal resuscitation were described by practitioners as time pressured and unpredictable albeit well-rehearsed. This is likely to be an emotional and stressful situation for the parents involved. The location of a neonatal resuscitation may vary and could include the labor suite, midwife-led unit, birthing pool room, operating theatre, patient’s home, or ambulance. Participants suggested that the portability of the system should therefore be prioritized. Practitioners considered the attachment features of the device to replicate those of a car satellite navigation screen, with options to secure (which implies the device is attached but can be adjusted) and rotate the screen to ensure a continual good line of sight. The physical environment suggests lighting may also vary (eg, bright theatre lights and variability in lighting within a single resuscitation). The device may also remain in use when transferring the baby between delivery and the neonatal unit or in ambulances, hence making it resistant to vibration and movement.

Alarms were considered useful only in certain contexts and the type, such as frequency, and pitch of alarm required sensitivity in design to avoid undesirable consequences for parents and clinicians [27,28].

The device may be used in the context of other medical devices (eg, Resuscitaire, a portable “platform” for neonatal resuscitation integrated with required equipment). Compatibility between equipment is essential to ensure usability and reliability.

The SME interviews (interviews 1 and 2 in Table 1) suggested seven relevant high-level cognitive tasks and produced the first study output, a high-level representation of the tasks required during neonatal resuscitation (Multimedia Appendix 2): establish a history of events, assess baby, interpret HR, interpret respiration, support respiration, continual reassessment, and decide to act.

These tasks were considered based on the core principles of the task analysis [29]. The top layer represents “what” has to be done (Multimedia Appendix 2), and further descriptions in the layer below describe “how” it has to be done (Multimedia Appendix 2). A visual representation was shared with clinicians within the workshops, and a consensus was reached for the final presentation. Figure 1 illustrates a sample of the representation shared.

Nine tasks in total were agreed upon by the SMEs and workshop participants, to have a cognitive element to them (Multimedia Appendix 2). The nine tasks included receive antenatal history, assess baby using Apgar score [30], interpret chest movement, interpret HR, decide on action, direct view and clearing of airway, assist breathing, decide to intubate, and decide to medicate.

The interviews completed during the development of the task diagram and the knowledge audit interview elicited information relevant to the difficulty and nature of the cognitive work including cues, assessment, judgements, problem solving, decisions, and actions combined with potential challenges and errors and strategies relevant to the nine cognitive tasks.

The findings from these first two stages of the ACTA method were verified and enriched by data obtained during the simulation interview workshop. The data from all three stages of the ACTA method were collated within a spreadsheet (a template of the one used is provided in Multimedia Appendix 2) and then combined and simplified to produce a cognitive demand table for each of the nine cognitive tasks (Textbox 2). These created the second and third study outputs.

The two workshop groups further informed the fourth and final study outputs, which produced a specification and illustrated mock ups with notable differences in the priorities for design. One group preferred to protect the simplicity of the device and represent HR as the only physiological marker, with an event timeline running in the background. The other group preferred to include oxygen saturation and a visible record of an event timeline (Figure 2).

After the two workshop groups had worked through the simulation independently, they together presented their specifications and mock ups. Individual participants were then asked to reflect on the work they had done in their groups and on the presentation from the other groups to produce their own personal interface design. These individual contributions were analyzed to interpret group preferences and produce cumulative representations of the data as a heat map (Figure 3). This indicates consensus on the location of interface information sources, summarizing individual location preferences (12 practitioners) of the five information types. The x-axis indicates the width of the screen and the y-axis indicates the height of the screen. Each screen was broken up into 24 areas (6 along the x-axis and 4 along the y-axis). The color bars are normalized against the maximum number of practitioner votes for each area on the heat map.

In summary, the stages within the ACTA method are provided below:

Themes relative to essential and desirable characteristics for the interface were elicited. These were combined with recommendations from international standards to produce a set of design requirements [20,23,31-35]. A typical example of the information contained within these requirements is provided in Textbox 3. The final decision for timer position was influenced by users and optimization of the display screen space. The information obtained informed the final design developed and indicated priorities for future usability testing. This information and the heat map were developed as a block diagram and informed the graphical user interface concept (Figure 4).

To our knowledge, the ACTA method has not been used in the development of resuscitation devices. There are many HFE methods relevant to the design process [36,37]. The value of methods suitable for identifying user requirements was considered previously [17], and that paper concluded that both focus groups and user testing were beneficial. ACTA in medical device design does not appear to be well applied [18] despite recognition that it could be a useful tool in the domain of health care [8]. The application of such methods, rather than just the completion of the traditional hierarchical task analysis, is well recognized for their benefit of formatively understanding critical cues, decision making, judgements, constraints, and potential errors in the context of a work situation; however, they are also considered resource intensive [8,38,36].

The ACTA was developed to address some of these issues. The method was developed to allow practitioners within the area of work studied and system designers to elicit cognitive requirements relative to task performance and translate these into design requirements [8].

This approach was considered desirable for this study as a method to understand user decision making and critical information requirements from the intended interface and to illustrate a method that could be applied by practitioners themselves in future design/evaluation of medical devices. In addition, pragmatically, the time available suggested that efficiency was desirable in any method selected, which the ACTA offered.

This method has allowed the tasks required for neonatal resuscitation to be fully considered in relation to cognitive requirements, actions, and potential errors. This participatory approach has offered a systematic analysis of the resuscitation process, described as “logical and rigorous” by the SMEs. Successful implementation within the context of health care has been suggested as benefiting from such participation to ensure that relevant stakeholders influence the design of an intervention to fit their own contexts [39]. ACTA allowed user requirements to be identified specific to different contexts and stages within the resuscitation process.

The success of the ACTA approach came from engaging participants from different job roles to consider contexts familiar to them and ensure practitioners considered cues with the greatest significance to completing the required tasks, likely errors, and how interface design can support these tasks. The outputs of this study have provided a comprehensive description of information requirements during neonatal resuscitation and enabled product developers to understand the core and preferred requirements of the user interface design for the device. These outputs have been used to develop an interface, which prioritizes simplicity and provides a set of user requirements, to test the device during future testing (Figure 5).

The study raised three key areas for the designers to consider, which had not previously been identified: interface layout and information priority, size and portability of the device, and auditory feedback.

The amount of information, which ultimately influences the size of the screen, will be determined by the intended function of the technology. Considering the task of neonatal resuscitation, it becomes apparent that early on in the process of resuscitation, HR is the key indicator used by practitioners. This information was prioritized by both groups and all individual designs of the interface. Some preferred that this alone should be the function of the device. It was considered desirable to ensure the device had a relatively small interface that could be positioned freely and local to the baby’s head. The auditory feedback proposed by practitioners was to support visual information and interventions early on in the resuscitation process. The nature of the feedback should communicate information on HR, such as rhythm and reliability of the trace. The practitioners went on to suggest that with different auditory settings, the device could be used as a monitoring device within a neonatal unit, not previously considered by the developers. The implications of auditory feedback raised the importance of considering both practitioners and patient representatives (eg, parents within future usability testing) [39].

An integral timer was also considered essential, as it would serve as an indicator for the timeline of events within a resuscitation. Currently, the clock started at the time of birth is integral to the Resuscitaire, but future user testing needs to explore how the novel device will influence this practice.

Considering the community setting, there may be less access to oxygen saturation devices. The novel HR device has the potential to compensate for this absence. Within secondary care, the oxygen saturation devices were considered useful when intubating, to secure an airway for the transfer to a neonatal unit. Including oxygen saturations implied greater usability for the device in alternative situations and work contexts in the future. However, practitioners also acknowledged a risk where oxygen saturations could actually be a distraction for less experienced practitioners from the critical cue of HR, which is considered a better indicator of neonatal status and relied upon by expert practitioners.

The benefit of having an HR reading immediately next to the baby’s head on the wireless module was considered of high value. This would reduce the need to continually look between the baby’s head and an interface screen, where the HR would be viewed at a distance. Suggestions were made about the functionality of the wireless module (Figure 1), including how it could be the component within the device used to download contextual information such as an event log. This would avoid the need for a separate memory stick or disc to store data, reducing the risk of lost device components or information, which is a current problem with other medical devices.

Failure to recognize or acknowledge a deteriorating HR was considered. The device design could incorporate feedback to increase awareness of this critical cue. A change in screen color was suggested as the preferred prompt by some; however, further usability testing is required to find out if this improves practitioner performance in reacting to a deteriorating HR or is perceived as distracting or anxiety provoking. How color is used on the interface will also need to be explored by using color convention guidance and usability testing [20,23,32,33].

The final decisions made on the interface layout were based on the optimization of the screen by the design team. “Future proofing” the device was also considered during the workshop and generated an enthusiastic discussion on how an additional, but linked, mobile device could be used to assist a designated scribe in recording key events within the resuscitation timeline. Currently, the accuracy of a written report of neonatal resuscitation is variable, usually involving the most inexperienced team member to scribe. Future electronic records were proposed as complementary to an event marker control, operated by those delivering or supporting the resuscitation, while recognizing that the timing may be slightly delayed. However, this was considered sufficient to develop a retrospective view of the sequence of events. The electronic recording of these data was considered of significant value for those in governance roles, clinical learning, and audit.

The ACTA method provides an efficient, comprehensive, and participatory approach capable of understanding user decision making and critical information requirements from the intended interface. Practitioners discussed the potential for this device beyond the original context considered by the developers.

The limitations of the study were in the sampling of clinicians. Volunteers led to the larger ratio of nurses and midwives to doctors. However, the SMEs were experienced doctors in neonatal resuscitation and fully engaged in the whole study. Limitations of this study have constrained further development of the interface, and device, simulation, and usability testing should ensure the views and suggestions raised by participants can be tested and translated into a real-world device.

This is the first study to apply the ACTA approach to elicit user requirements for a novel device for neonatal resuscitation. This study demonstrates the application of human factors to inform the development of resuscitation devices, and more generally, for medical device developers and clinicians in the design and evaluation of medical technologies.

The study has provided previously unidentified user requirements and details about the variables, which will inform future usability testing of the interface developed.