MyNRMN was developed by TAS in 2016 as part of the NRMN. Various forms of individual guided mentoring, free-form mentoring, and group mentoring are offered by the NRMN [1,2]. Prior to the development of MyNRMN, the NRMN online resources consisted of a website with information about the program. Since 2016, the MyNRMN platform has supported many online features and resources for mentors and mentees to connect, seek peer or group mentoring, provide guided online mentoring, and create a network of mentors.

The first step to finding a mentor was joining MyNRMN. To begin the enrollment process, the users registered by using a third-party service—Auth0 (Okta Inc)—to authenticate their sign-in information via Gmail, LinkedIn, Facebook, or email address and password. This service was especially beneficial when integrating the social sign-ins, particularly while modifying the required registration fields throughout this study.

To finish the process, users completed an online enrollment form that included demographic information. An enrollment form was already used at the time Vanderbilt University Medical Center inherited the MyNRMN registration process during the Phase II U24 award period. This “legacy” form, which was designed primarily for data collection, included 19 fields arranged in 2 columns, with all fields required to complete enrollment (Figure 1). The lengthy slate of questions contained potentially sensitive fields, such as fields for ethnicity, disability, and gender. We observed that many users dropped out of the enrollment process after creating an Auth0 account and before completing the form. We became concerned that having sensitive questions early in the process hindered our efforts to recruit diverse members. An additional fear was losing potential members by not offering alternative log-in methods, particularly logging in via social media, which younger users may prefer.

In hopes of increasing enrollment completion, we created the version 1 form and tested it against the original legacy form. The version 1 form asked the same questions in an improved user interface. In contrast to the legacy form, the version 1 form used a wizard format with 3 tabs. The first 2 tabs presented 11 required fields, while the third tab contained optional fields (Figure 2). When implementing the multipage format, we anticipated reduced perceptions of the form being burdensome.

From July 1, 2019, to August 26, 2020, we used split testing to evaluate the different registration forms to optimize enrollment. To conduct split testing, we programmed the system to randomly redirect each user, after Auth0 sign-in, to 1 of 2 enrollment forms—the legacy form or the version 1 form. Despite seeing some improvement in enrollment among users who were provided with the version 1 form, the improvement was not as significant as anticipated. This motivated us to continue revising the form to develop the version 2 form (Figure 3). The version 2 form allowed users to create an Auth0 account and enroll synchronously. Sensitive questions were removed from the first steps in the version 2 form, and members were prompted, but not required, to complete these questions after enrollment. We observed that removing the requirement to complete the sensitive fields prior to enrollment significantly increased user enrollment. The NRMN’s goal is to increase diversity in the biomedical workforce. To measure the impact of our mentoring platform, we collect demographic data during the user enrollment process. Beginning with the version 2 form, the only demographic information that has been collected during enrollment is race. Since August 26, 2020, all new users have been redirected to the version 2 form, which replaced the legacy and version 1 forms.

The MyNRMN platform’s goal is to help members increase connections to build and expand their networks. The larger the network, the greater the opportunity to engage with members who are diverse with respect to gender, racial and ethnic background, and other demographics. To facilitate finding and acquiring new connections on MyNRMN, we developed the following new features and modes:

We estimated descriptive statistics for variables in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc). To examine the effect of form type on form completion, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated for odds of completing enrollment by form type and within demographic subgroups. Subgroup analyses were conducted for demographic subgroups with sufficient data available (eg, White, African American, and Asian race subgroups) and on the basis of which fields were required for enrollment completion. After implementing the version 2 form, some demographic fields were converted to optional fields, which resulted in some users leaving these fields blank, hence the incomplete (“Missing from Total”) data in our data set.

This study was approved by the NRMN’s institutional review board (reference number: 2015‐0720). All user data were protected under and provided by the North Texas Regional Institutional Review Board and stored securely.

Prior to August 26, 2020, a user joining MyNRMN was required to complete the following two steps: (1) create an account with Auth0 and (2) fill in all required fields in the enrollment form. Our analysis showed improvement in completed enrollments that used the version 1 form when compared to those that used the legacy form (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30-1.78). The version 2 form, with its simplified, 1-step process and fewer required fields, outperformed the legacy form (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.90-2.50).

Table 1 describes the proportions of users who completed enrollment by form type and demographic characteristics. Figure 4 displays the users who completed enrollment by form type and self-identified race. In the version 1 form, the field for ethnicity was optional. In the version 2 form, the fields for ethnicity, gender, and education were optional.

We performed subgroup analyses to determine if enrollment completion differed within demographic subgroups by form type (Table 2). We compared the legacy and version 1 forms for gender, race, education, and log-in method subgroups, since these were required fields. The version 1 form performed better than the legacy form for male users, female users, White users, Black or African American users, Asian users, graduate students, nonstudents, and persons who used the username-password method. We compared the version 2 and legacy forms for race and log-in method subgroups, since these were required fields. The version 2 form performed better than the legacy form when users used the username-password method (version 1: OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.39-2.04; version 2: OR 3.70, 95% CI 3.07-4.46) or LinkedIn (version 1: OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.93-2.85; version 2: OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.55-4.12). The version 2 form also performed better than the legacy form in terms of facilitating enrollment completion among White, Black or African American, and Asian users.

After implementing the version 2 form, the amount of mentoring requests grew for all types of mentor-mentee connections, including peer-to-peer connections (Figure 5). However, the percentage of accepted connection requests has remained relatively consistent. Of the total requests to connect, roughly half have been accepted. Although very few requests have been actively declined, a large percentage remain pending.

Networking connections originated via several pathways (Table 3). Both mentors and mentees made extensive use of the Recommendations feature that suggests connections on the user dashboard. Via the Search and Profile connection pathways, mentees initiated more connections than mentors.

Providing access to mentors and meeting the need for mentoring are essential to grow and enhance the biomedical workforce, and the value of mentorship in accessing the connections needed to advance professionally has been long established [10,11]. Research shows that the probability of individual success increases when multiple mentors with differing backgrounds and levels of expertise are tapped for support [12]. This network of mentors facilitates growth that is tailored to an individual’s goals by providing the multiple perspectives needed for professional and personal growth [13-15].

Our results show that our enrollment forms work similarly well for female and male users, and the version 1 form performed better (enrollment rate of male users: 260/280, 92.9%; enrollment rate of female users: 663/718, 92.3%) for both groups than the legacy form (enrollment rate of male users: 236/291, 81.1%; enrollment rate of female users: 526/677, 77.7%). This is an important consideration in decreasing traditional gender disparities in the biomedical sciences—a situation that the NIH has recognized by designating female individuals as underrepresented. Although the version 1 form was established as superior to the legacy form in terms of enrollment completion, it did not perform as anticipated. We discussed the shortcomings of the existing forms with MyNRMN stakeholders, including the NRMN-Resource Center, the Product Council (which included representative NRMN members), and the NIH project scientist. After collaborative discussions, we simplified the enrollment process in the version 2 form. We discovered that the design of the user interface did not negatively affect enrollment, which was instead affected by the length and sensitive nature of the information required. After reducing the number of required questions and moving sensitive questions to an optional postenrollment form, our rate of registration completion increased significantly (P<.001; Table 1). Moreover, improved registration completion was observed for racial subgroups that used the version 2 form when compared to those that used the legacy form.

In fostering mentoring connections, we found that most mentors (724/1203, 60.2%) extensively used more passive features, such as the Recommendations. In contrast, mentees were more likely to proactively use the Search feature or the Profile feature to build connections when compared to mentors. Both of these features use the personalized recommendation algorithm and natural language processing when providing results. The recommendation algorithm pulls information from a user’s profile, as well as from their network connections within the platform. To promote the further expansion of personal networks, we developed the following five new features: (1) the Groups feature (members can join discussion and collaboration groups to connect with others who shared common interests); (2) the Ask Me A Question feature (members can ask questions prior to requesting a connection and then initiate the connection request); (3) the Invites feature (members can invite peers, colleagues, or friends to join MyNRMN and connect); (4) the My Cohort feature (institutions and organizations can bring their members to the platform to connect within the cohort and throughout MyNRMN); and (5) the Administrative Match feature (mentees can request a system administrator to initiate a mentoring request to a mentor). Because these features are relatively new, we did not include them in our results. Favorable initial data, however, demonstrate the value of continually adding novel features. Providing the online platform to facilitate mentoring connections, in conjunction with providing additional professional development resources and multiple, easy-to-use enrollment options, has aided the growth of MyNRMN, which now has 30,000 users (as of April 2024). Developing new strategies to promote networking connections may further support MyNRMN platform engagement for additional resources.

We were successful in increasing enrollment on our platform and understanding users’ preferences for the enrollment form. However, we identified a limitation in our A/B testing process, and we believe that a longer testing period and more iterations could provide us with more data for enhancing the user enrollment process. In our future work, we will aim to study how we can encourage participation from underrepresented groups, such as Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander individuals or people who do not identify within the gender binary.

The MyNRMN platform’s goal is to ensure that mentoring connection requests are seen and are acted upon. Requests to connect are too frequently languishing, especially those made through the Recommendations feature; these may appear less personally targeted than those made through other features. Therefore, we are examining how to strengthen the relevancy of our recommendation algorithm by using machine learning and our graph database for more tailored recommendations. To nudge those receiving a connection request, the platform will remind members immediately upon logging in and will also send email reminders. To ensure that the enrollment and connection emails are received, we will continually monitor spam filter rules and comply with changes and updates that are implemented by email services. In addition, pending requests for connections will be displayed prominently on the dashboard or as a pop-up.

Our goal is to quickly increase each new member’s network from the initial node of 1 to an ever-widening web of connections. We plan to begin including embedded recommendations in a monthly email. In addition, when a connection is accepted, the confirmation email will include additional recommendations.

We built a platform for online mentoring to meet the needs of our members and to add value by increasing their connections. By conducting the A/B testing of enrollment forms, we were able to identify and overcome a barrier to enrollment and thus provide mentoring, networking, and professional development resources to a broader audience, which in turn promotes the diversification of the biomedical workforce. We continue to evaluate our paradigm and improve our engagement. Many of our ideas are generalizable to those building other membership networks. These entities can learn from our experience that creating multiple pathways, such as by providing social media options for account creation, achieves better results than a single track and that removing sensitive questions, such as those about gender and sexual identity, can attract a more diverse membership. For MyNRMN, our key value proposition is increasing network connections, which we achieve through the technology solutions described herein. By making the enrollment process less onerous and sensitive, ensuring that new members feel instantly welcome, and constantly developing and implementing novel engagement features, MyNRMN fosters an environment that engages an increasingly diverse population of mentors and mentees.