TY  - JOUR
AU  - Latuapon, Elizabeth
AU  - Hochstenbach, Laura
AU  - Mahr, Dominik
AU  - Scheenstra, Bart
AU  - Kietselaer, Bas
AU  - Spreeuwenberg, Marieke
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023/10/24
TI  - Cocreation to Facilitate Communication and Collaboration Between Multidisciplinary Stakeholders in eHealth Research and Development: Case Study of the CARRIER (Coronary Artery Disease: Risk Estimations and Interventions for Prevention and Early Detection) Consortium
JO  - JMIR Hum Factors
SP  - e45006
VL  - 10
KW  - eHealth
KW  - cocreation
KW  - stakeholder involvement
KW  - multidisciplinary collaboration
KW  - multidisciplinary
KW  - team dynamic
KW  - group dynamic
KW  - collaborate
KW  - collaboration
KW  - cardiovascular
KW  - personalized
KW  - personalization
KW  - cardiology
KW  - organizational
KW  - co-design
KW  - atherosclerosis
AB  - Background: Collaboration with diverse stakeholders in eHealth research is fundamental yet complex. Stakeholders from various disciplines do not “speak the same language” and have different levels of power and interest, resulting in contrasting objectives, priorities, and expectations. An approach to constructive communication and collaboration is necessary to overcome this complex dynamic. Cocreation, known in the field of eHealth most often to involve end users, may also be suitable for facilitating stakeholder engagement and alignment. Objective: This paper provides insights into the application of cocreation, specifically in the early phases of research that focus on involving and aligning relevant stakeholders from different academic and professional backgrounds. Methods: The case for this study was a group discussion with members of a multidisciplinary consortium that works on developing a personalized eHealth intervention for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Using stakeholder mapping, health and medicine experts, big data scientists, software developers, and an innovation manager (N=8) were invited to participate. The discussion was based on a user scenario and structured according to the Six Thinking Hats of de Bono, representing 6 different types of thinking. The discussion was recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically with the use of ATLAS.ti software. Results: First, informative and intuitive thinking served the preparatory purpose of familiarization with the project details and other participants. Second, positive and critical thinking constituted the body of the discussion and resulted in an in-depth conversation. Third, creative and organizational thinking were action oriented and focused on solutions and planning to safeguard future progress. The participants repeatedly reflected on various intervention-related themes, ranging from intervention content to technical functionalities and from legal requirements to implementation in practice. Moreover, project-related matters were discussed, including stakeholder management and time and budget constraints. Conclusions: This paper demonstrates how cocreation can be of value for multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement and alignment. Based on stakeholder mapping (with whom to discuss), a dream user scenario (what to discuss), and the Six Thinking Hats of de Bono (how to discuss), the participants shared information, discussed differences, searched for solutions, and moved toward a collective approach regarding intervention development. The lessons learned may further improve the understanding of how cocreation can contribute to multidisciplinary collaboration. 
SN  - 2292-9495
UR  - https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2023/1/e45006
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/45006
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37874629
DO  - 10.2196/45006
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/45006
ER  -