Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Sep 16, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 15, 2020 - Sep 29, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Emotional Reactions to a Mental Health Chatbot Among Adolescents: An Experimental Study

  • Audrey Mariamo; 
  • Caroline Elizabeth Temcheff; 
  • Pierre-Marjorique Léger; 
  • Sylvain Sénécal; 
  • Marianne Lau

ABSTRACT

Background:

Psychological distress increases across adolescence and has been associated with a number of important health outcomes, with consequences that can extend into adulthood. One type of technological innovation that may serve as a unique intervention for youth experiencing psychological distress is the conversational agent (CA), otherwise known as a chatbot. Further research is needed on mental health chatbots - notably those designed for adolescents. The experimental mental health chatbot used in this study was designed to support adolescents experiencing psychological distress.

Objective:

The current study aimed to assess adolescents’ perceived emotional reactions to questions posed by a mental health chatbot and to evaluate adolescents’ preferences concerning the formulation of the chatbot’s questions.

Methods:

We recruited 21 adolescents aged 14 to 17 to participate in a pilot study with a 2x2x3 within-subjects factorial design. Each participant was sequentially presented with 96 chatbot questions for a duration of eight seconds per question. Following each presentation, participants were asked to indicate how likely they were to respond to the question, as well as their perceived affective reaction to the question. Demographic data and participant feedback were also collected.

Results:

Participants were an average of 15.4 years old (SD 1.05) and mostly female (60%; 12 females; 8 males). Logistic regressions showed that presence of GIFs (Graphics Interchange Format) predicted perceived emotional valence (β = -.40; P < .001), such that questions without GIFs were associated with a lower perceived emotional valence. Question type predicted emotional valence, such that yes/no questions (β = -.23; P = .03) and open-ended questions (β = -.26; P = .01) were associated with a lower perceived emotional valence compared to multiple response choice questions. Question type also predicted likelihood of response, such that yes/no questions were associated with a lower likelihood of response compared to multiple response choice questions (β = -.24; P = .03) and a higher likelihood of response compared to open-ended questions (β = .54; P < .001).

Conclusions:

The findings of this study add to the rapidly growing field of teen-computer interaction and contribute to our understanding of adolescent user experience in their interactions with a mental health chatbot. The insights gained from this study may be of assistance to developers and designers of mental health chatbots.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mariamo A, Temcheff CE, Léger P, Sénécal S, Lau M

Emotional Reactions to a Mental Health Chatbot Among Adolescents: An Experimental Study

JMIR Preprints. 16/09/2020:24343

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.24343

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/24343

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.