Accessibility settings

JMIR Human Factors

(Re-)designing health care and making health care interventions and technologies usable, safe, and effective.

Editor-in-Chief:

Andre Kushniruk, BA, MSc, PhD, FACMI, School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Canada


Impact Factor 3.9 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 5.6 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Human Factors is a multidisciplinary journal with contributions from design experts, medical researchers, engineers, and social scientists.

JMIR Human Factors focuses on understanding how the behaviour and thinking of humans can influence and shape the design of health care interventions and technologies, and how the design can be evaluated and improved to make health care interventions and technologies usable, safe, and effective. This includes usability studies and heuristic evaluations, studies concerning ergonomics and error prevention, design studies for medical devices and healthcare systems/workflows, enhancing teamwork through Human Factors based teamwork training, measuring non-technical skills in staff like leadership, communication, situational awareness and teamwork, and healthcare policies and procedures to reduce errors and increase safety.

JMIR Human Factors focuses aspires to lead health care towards a culture of "usability by design", as well as to a culture of testing, error-prevention and safety, by promoting and publishing reports rigorously evaluating the usability and human factors aspects in health care, as well as encouraging the development and debate on new methods in this emerging field. Possible contributions include usability studies and heuristic evaluations, studies concerning ergonomics and error prevention, design studies for medical devices and healthcare systems/workflows, enhancing teamwork through human factors-based teamwork training, measuring non-technical skills in staff like leadership, communication, situational awareness and teamwork, and healthcare policies and procedures to reduce errors and increase safety. Reviews, viewpoint papers and tutorials are as welcome as original research.

JMIR Human Factors is indexed in National Library of Medicine (NLM)/MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, DOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa Romeo, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science (WoS)/ESCI.

JMIR Human Factors received a 2025 Impact Factor of 3.9, ranking Q1 in Health Care Sciences & Services (46/194).

JMIR Human Factors received a Scopus CiteScore of 5.6 (2025), placing it in the 69th percentile (15/48) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Human Factors and Ergonomics, and in the 66th percentile (56/168) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Health Informatics.


Recent Articles

Smartphone screen displaying a chat interface with AI chatbot messages and user replies.
User-Centered Design Case Studies

Cognitive reappraisal is a widely studied emotion regulation strategy that helps individuals reinterpret stressful situations in ways that reduce their emotional impact. Digital mental health (DMH) tools often struggle to support this process because scripted templates fail to adapt to the varied and incomplete ways users describe their stressors. Large language models (LLMs) offer opportunities to increase conversational flexibility while preserving structured intervention steps.

Students in lab coats use tablets in a classroom with a teacher presenting on a screen.
Design and Evaluation of Medical Education Materials

Formative assessment plays a central role in medical education by offering low-risk practice and timely feedback, particularly in visually and practically demanding courses, such as morphology. Gamified digital tools can foster active learning; however, their educational value relies on pedagogical integration rather than technology alone. The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model provides a framework for understanding this relationship.

Man using a home blood pressure monitor and smartphone
User-Centered Design Case Studies

Clinical guidelines recommend integrated, person-centered care with control of modifiable risk factors and coexisting conditions in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but many receive insufficient risk factor management. Digital health technologies may provide valuable support in addressing this gap.

Woman conducting a resume review with a man in an office setting.
Design, Usability, and Evaluation of Research Instruments, Scales, and Measures

Privacy concerns represent a primary barrier to the adoption of large language model (LLM) applications, particularly in sensitive domains such as health care. Although a growing body of survey-based research has examined user privacy concerns with LLMs, no standardized instrument exists for measuring this construct.

Man wearing a VR headset, experiencing immersive virtual reality gaming.
Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research

Uptake of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia screening among community-dwelling older adults remains suboptimal globally and is shaped by limited dementia literacy, fear, stigma, and difficulties navigating services. Virtual reality (VR)–assisted education may enhance engagement, but older adults’ experiences of such education and the contextual conditions shaping screening intentions require further understanding.

Woman reviews health records and check-up list on a tablet device.
Design, Usability, and Evaluation of Research Instruments, Scales, and Measures

Probability-based surveys remain essential to epidemiology, but expanding mixed-mode data collection, which combines web self-completion and interviewer-administered surveys, raises concerns that administration mode and interviewer presence may influence health reporting. These concerns warrant further investigation of interviewer-related biases and mode differences in health reporting.

Modern medical examination room with examination table and desk
Participatory Design and Participatory Research

AI is increasingly prevalent within health care; however, its implementation within the hospital setting may come with its own limitations, given the high-pressure and sensitive environment. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of AI within hospitals have been largely explored quantitatively, and there is a scarcity of qualitative research on the implementation of AI tools to improve air quality.

Nurse explains CGM data on tablet to patient with glucose sensor on arm
Design and Usability of Consumer Health Tech and Home Monitoring Devices

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. In primary prevention, effective communication of individual risk and support for behavior change are crucial. Interactive risk visualizations can enhance understanding and engagement, while continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers immediate feedback on the physiological effects of daily choices.

Google Play Store app ratings and reviews showing a 5.0 star rating
Methods in Human Factors Research

In 2019, Germany introduced a unique regulatory framework for digital therapeutics (DTx), termed digital health applications (DiGAs) in Germany, with the goal of integrating evidence-based DTx into statutory health care. DTx are eligible for reimbursement by statutory health insurance if manufacturers demonstrate positive health care effects, such as improved health status or health literacy, in a controlled study setting. Although regulatory evaluation primarily relies on manufacturer-conducted studies, these studies do not fully capture how users experience and use DiGAs in everyday life.

ECG monitor displays heart rate, brain activity, and patient vitals in hospital room.
Usability Evaluation Case Studies

Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) reduces complications of mechanical ventilation, yet adherence in intensive care units (ICUs) remains inconsistent. Digital dashboards may support LPV by improving situational awareness and supporting protocol adherence. However, adoption of such tools in high-acuity clinical environments depends on a range of cognitive, professional, and contextual determinants. The Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI) provides a validated framework to systematically assess these factors.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with