Published on in Vol 13 (2026)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/77323, first published .
Smartphone App Using Reinforcement Learning for Obesity: Single-Arm Feasibility Study

Smartphone App Using Reinforcement Learning for Obesity: Single-Arm Feasibility Study

Smartphone App Using Reinforcement Learning for Obesity: Single-Arm Feasibility Study

1Department of Stress Sciences and Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

2Educational Physiology Laboratory, Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

3Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Corresponding Author:

Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi, MD, PhD


Background: While behavioral interventions remain an evidence-based treatment for obesity, they often require long durations and frequent sessions. To address this, we hypothesized that interventions delivered in daily life via a smartphone app combined with personalized optimization using reinforcement learning may effectively support behavior changes.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the feasibility of such an app for individuals with obesity.

Methods: We developed a smartphone app to assist in setting and reviewing daily behaviors related to weight loss. On the screen on which daily behaviors were shown, the order of presentation was optimized using Thompson sampling, a multiarmed bandit algorithm. Twenty individuals with obesity used the app for 4 weeks, and the daily app use rates were quantified. Body weight and mood status were measured daily during the study, and a brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were administered at the beginning and end of the study. Changes in these measures were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Furthermore, the longitudinal data collected during this study were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model to examine factors related to the number of behaviors performed daily.

Results: All 20 recruited individuals with obesity completed the 4-week study schedule. The median app use rate was 98.3% (range 76.9%‐100%). Significant improvements were observed in BMI (median at start 34.9 kg/m2, range 27.4-52.9; median at end 34.1 kg/m2, range 26.7‐51.0; P=.01), as well as daily energy intake and weekend sitting time. The linear mixed-effects model showed a significant association between higher preceding depressive mood levels and fewer behaviors (P<.001).

Conclusions: The feasibility of the smartphone app using reinforcement learning for obesity was sufficient, and the potential effectiveness of the treatment was suggested. Preceding depressive mood may influence daily behaviors related to weight loss.

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e77323

doi:10.2196/77323

Keywords



Obesity leads to diseases such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension, which further increase the risk of serious complications, including cardiovascular diseases and certain types of cancer [1]. Obesity often coexists with psychiatric disorders and has a bidirectional relationship with them [2]. Obesity reduces well-being, resulting in a vicious cycle that leads to further weight gain [3]. The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide, including in Japan [4], underscoring the need for effective treatment.

Current obesity treatments include glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and bariatric surgery, which cause adverse gastrointestinal effects and postoperative psychiatric comorbidities, respectively [5-7]. Behavioral interventions remain important as a low-risk and low-cost treatment [5,8], and successful long-term weight maintenance often relies on behavioral strategies [5]. Although structured cognitive behavioral therapy for obesity has been developed [9,10], the frequent and long duration of sessions burdens both participants and therapists. Furthermore, behavioral science findings indicate that reinforcers should be provided immediately after performing behaviors [11], which is challenging in outpatient settings. To address these issues, we hypothesized that ecological momentary intervention (EMI) through smartphone apps in daily life would be helpful [12,13].

In the context of EMI for obesity, tailored presentation of behavioral content may play an important role in promoting effective behavior change. In face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy, behavior changes for diet and physical activity are tailored to individuals’ daily lifestyles and preferences [9,10]. From a technical perspective, machine learning and reinforcement learning have been widely deployed for content optimization in modern web applications and smartphone apps [14]. One study used a multiarmed bandit algorithm, an optimization technique using reinforcement learning, to suggest health behaviors [15]. The algorithm explores items with limited prior information to reduce uncertainty and simultaneously exploits items with higher estimated rewards based on accumulated data. Such optimization by multiarmed bandit algorithms is applicable for recommending daily behaviors to individuals with obesity through smartphone apps.

Numerous studies on smartphone apps and web-based interventions for obesity have been conducted, and an umbrella review suggests that they can achieve greater weight loss when combined with usual treatments [16]. Relevant studies have involved sending text messages related to physical activity or dietary intake [17-20]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has used an app specifically designed for setting daily behaviors with personalization using machine learning or reinforcement learning. Accordingly, such an app would be novel and could lead to more effective treatments.

Additionally, the completion of behaviors related to weight loss suggested through smartphone apps may be influenced by daily psychosocial factors. Many psychosocial factors reportedly influence the maintenance and progression of obesity [2,3,5]. Studies using ecological momentary assessments, which analyze data collected in daily life, have suggested that preceding mood status and other factors influence daily calorie intake and physical activity in individuals with obesity [21-24]. Examining the relationship between daily behaviors and preceding mood collected through a smartphone app may help improve the app.

In summary, we hypothesized that interventions in daily life delivered via smartphone apps could effectively address current challenges in behavioral interventions and that personalization through multiarmed bandit algorithms could further enhance their effectiveness. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a smartphone app with a multiarmed bandit algorithm for individuals with obesity and evaluate its feasibility. In addition, as psychosocial factors may influence the effectiveness of this intervention, the secondary aim was to examine factors influencing daily behaviors related to weight loss.


Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Tokyo (2022061NI). The research protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000048667). All the participants provided written informed consent. All data were anonymized, and access was limited to authorized research team members only. Participants received up to JP¥ 20,000 (approximately US $150 based on the exchange rate at the time of study start) via QUO Card.

Smartphone App

Figure 1 shows screenshots of the smartphone app we developed for obesity management. Users launch the app upon receiving a notification at the end of the day, typically in the evening at an individually preset time, and select behaviors to perform the following day (Figure 1A). The selected behaviors can be further modified for specificity (Figure 1B). The user receives reminder notifications several times the following day regarding the behaviors they have set. Upon receiving a notification at the end of the following day, users launch the app to record whether they performed the selected behaviors and log any additional behaviors (Figure 1C). Users then select the behaviors to perform the following day. The researchers prepared a behavioral list based on the cognitive behavioral therapy manual [9] and the Japanese guidelines for obesity management [4]. Each participant can also create original items individually. The app displays a complimentary message and a graphical presentation of the number of behaviors performed immediately after recording them.

The presentation order was optimized to display easily achievable, low-effort items earlier on the screen (Figure 1A). This optimization was based on the theory of cognitive behavioral therapy [9,10] and the Fogg behavior model [25], similar to a study on a smartphone app using reinforcement learning to promote health-related activities [15]. A multiarmed bandit algorithm was used, which simultaneously performs exploration (collecting data to determine which items are achievable) and exploitation (presenting achievable items based on the collected data). This has the advantage that it can be applied to even a small number of users while ensuring a diversity of suggestions [14].

Figure 1. Screenshots of the app (translated from Japanese into English): (A) at the end of the day, users select behaviors to perform the following day, with on-screen guidance encouraging them to choose top-listed items suggested by a reinforcement learning algorithm; (B) selected behaviors can be specified further (eg, “Reduce snacking” to “Reduce intake of donuts”); and (C) a notification is sent at the end of the following day to record whether the selected behaviors were performed. Users can also log additional behaviors performed.

We used Thompson sampling, a multiarmed bandit algorithm that does not require prior hyperparameter adjustments [14]. In this study, each behavior was treated as an independent arm and scored by a randomly sampled value of θ from the following beta distribution, where N is the number of times the user selects the item and a is the number of executions:

pθa,N=θa(1-θ)N-a01θa(1-θ)N-adθ

When N is small, samples of θ from the beta distribution exhibit a large variance, and the model assigns random scores to behaviors with few selections, which promotes exploration. As N increases, the samples converge toward the actual achievable rate of each behavior, which promotes exploitation by assigning higher scores to behaviors with higher completion rates than to those with lower completion rates. In this study, each participant had an independent model trained using only their own behavior data. Each behavior was initialized with a uniform prior over the interval (0, 1).

The app was developed using Flutter (Google) and Firebase (Google). Reinforcement learning was implemented using Python (version 3.9; Python Software Foundation) on the Google Cloud Platform. The app was distributed exclusively to participants’ smartphones (iPhone or Android) through DeployGate (DeployGate, Inc) [26] rather than being publicly released on the Apple App Store or Google Play Store.

Study Participants

This study included individuals diagnosed with “obesity disease” according to criteria established by the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. This disease is defined as a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2 with one or more obesity-related disorders such as type 2 diabetes or visceral fat accumulation that likely causes health problems [4,27]. Individuals aged ≥18 years attending the University of Tokyo Hospital were eligible for this study. Exclusion criteria were (1) extremely severe physical or psychiatric diseases, (2) conditions for which the burden of the study would be harmful, and (3) lack of decision-making ability.

A previous study examining the feasibility of an app using a multiarmed bandit algorithm included approximately 20 participants over 3 weeks [15]. Following this, we set the study period to 4 weeks (28 days) and the sample size to 20. Eligible individuals were recruited continuously until the target sample size was achieved.

Study Procedure

Figure 2 provides the study schedule. At the beginning of the study, the Japanese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) long form, last–7-day version, was used to assess physical activity [28]. The brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ) was used to assess nutritional intake [29]. The BDHQ consists of questions assessing the consumption frequency of 58 food and beverage items over the preceding month and estimates average daily energy intake and various nutrient intakes.

Figure 2. Study schedule. The study period lasted 28 days, with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ) measured at the start and end of the study. Daily behaviors related to weight loss, mood, and weight were recorded during the study period.

During the study, daily behaviors were recorded using the app. Participants received a notification daily at a random time within a prearranged 1-hour interval and recorded their mood status (Figure 3). Nine items from the Depression and Anxiety Mood Scale were used to calculate scores for anxiety, positive affect, and depression [30]. This was recorded on a 101-point (0‐100) visual analog scale. Additionally, we provided the participants with a body scale (HN300T2; OMRON) connected via Bluetooth to a smartphone (iPhone or Android) to record weight automatically [31]. Their weight was recorded daily upon waking.

Figure 3. Screenshot of records of daily momentary mood status (translated from Japanese into English).

At the end of the 4-week study, the IPAQ and the BDHQ were administered, as at the start of the study. The top 5 behaviors displayed on the app screen were evaluated on paper using a visual analog scale regarding their subjective likelihood of achievement. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted to identify potential improvements to the app.

Statistical Analyses

Feasibility was assessed via app use rate, defined as the percentage of days on which the behavior was recorded during the study period. Relevant EMI studies using smartphone apps for obesity or type 2 diabetes have reported recording rates of approximately 80% to 95% [20,32,33], which we set as the benchmark for feasibility.

BMI, physical activity measured using the IPAQ, and calorie and salt intake measured using the BDHQ were compared between the start and end of the study using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, with statistical significance set at .05.

These analyses were performed using R (version 4.3.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Analysis of Predictors of Daily Behaviors for Weight Loss

In this post hoc analysis, we combined data on daily behaviors with mood status recorded within the preceding 24 hours. Only behavioral records reviewed more than 12 hours and less than 36 hours after setting were included. A linear mixed-effects model was developed using this nested longitudinal dataset, with the daily number of behaviors performed as the outcome. The outcome was defined as the sum of the preselected behaviors that were actually performed and any additional behaviors.

Level 1 variables included (1) preceding mood status (anxiety, positive affect, and depression) measured using the Depression and Anxiety Mood Scale, which was scaled from 0 to 1; (2) the difference between the weight recorded immediately before the behavior review and the weight at the start of the study; (3) the difference between the weight recorded immediately before the behavior review and the weight recorded at one earlier time point; and (4) the number of weeks, ranging from 1 to 4. Level 2 variables included (1) sex; (2) BMI at the start, centered by subtracting 35; and (3) the presence of comorbid psychiatric disorders. The inclusion of these variables and random effects was determined based on the Akaike information criterion.

R (version 4.3.1) and the package lmerTest (version 3.1-3) were used for this analysis.


Feasibility Evaluation

Participants were recruited from August 2022 to July 2023, and all 20 individuals with obesity completed the 4-week study. Table 1 provides the descriptive statistics. The median app use rate, defined as the percentage of days on which behaviors were recorded, was 98.3% (range 76.9%‐100%), with a mean of 94.8% (SD 7.1%).

Table 1. Characteristics of the participants (N=20).
Values
Age (years), median (range)43 (21-66)
Sex, n (%)
Male9 (45)
Female11 (55)
BMI at start (kg/m2), median (range)34.9 (27.4-52.9)
Height (cm), median (range)164.4 (151.0-184.0)
Weight at start (kg), median (range)93.6 (70.5-158.3)
Bariatric surgery (laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy)
Individuals who underwent surgery, n (%)4 (20)
Postoperative period (months), median (range)17.6 (7.8-45.1)
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use
Semaglutide, n (%)7 (35)
Liraglutide, n (%)1 (5)
Duration of use (months), median (range)6.3 (0.3-154.9)
Physical comorbidities, n (%)
Type 2 diabetes12 (60)
Hypertension14 (70)
Obstructive sleep apnea10 (50)
Dyslipidemia13 (65)
Psychiatric comorbidities, n (%)
Depression2 (10)
Bipolar disorder2 (10)
Adjustment disorder2 (10)
Sleep disorder4 (20)
Binge eating disorder2 (10)

Treatment Effectiveness

Table 2 shows treatment-related results. BMI decreased significantly (median at start 34.9 kg/m2, range 27.4‐52.9; median at end 34.1 kg/m2, range 26.7‐51.0; P=.01). In total, 15% (3/20) of the participants gained weight during the study period, 2 of whom had undergone bariatric surgery. Significant changes were also observed in calorie intake and weekend sitting time.

Table 2. Changes in treatment-related measurements.
Before the intervention (baseline), median (range)After the intervention (4 weeks), median (range)P value
BMI (kg/m2)34.9 (27.4‐52.9)34.1 (26.7‐51.0).01
BDHQa
 Calorie intake (kcal/day)1603 (541‐4191)1367 (527‐2572).04
 Salt intake (g/day)9.0 (3.7‐21.1)8.5 (4.4‐20.9).09
IPAQb
 Physical activity (METc minutes/week)2716 (99‐13566)3413 (537‐13506).70
 Weekday sitting (hours/day)5 (1-14)4 (1-13).06
 Weekend sitting (hours/day)6.5 (2-14)4.5 (1-12).008

aBDHQ: brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire.

bIPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

cMET: metabolic equivalent of task.

Usability Survey

The median number of behaviors performed over the 4 weeks, including individually created behaviors, was 11 (range 6‐27). The subjective evaluation of the achievability of the items presented at the top of the app screen, which ranged from 0 to 100, had a median score of 85 (range 58‐100).

In the qualitative interviews, the most frequently raised concern was the following (8/20, 40%):

Toward the latter part of the study period, I tended to choose only a few types of items displayed at the top and felt a sense of monotony.

This implies that the algorithm converged on a small subset of items with higher completion rates toward the end of the study, resulting in these items being repeatedly displayed at the top and predominantly selected by users.

The next most frequently raised concern was the following (6/20, 30%):

I was unable to modify some items to be more specific.

This means that, although each behavior could be further specified, as exemplified in Figure 1B, users had difficulty doing so for several items.

Predictors of Daily Behaviors for Weight Loss

A total of 432 records collected during the study were included in the analysis. The final model developed based on the Akaike information criterion is presented below, where subscript i denotes each participant and subscript j denotes the time point. Yi,j is the daily number of behaviors performed, Depressioni,j is the preceding depressive mood, and Psychiatryi indicates the presence of psychiatric comorbidities. Fixed and random effects are represented by γ and ζ, respectively.

Level 1:

Yi,j=Π0,i+Π1,iDepressioni,j+εi,j

Level 2:

Π0,i=γ0,0+ζ0,i
Π1,i=γ1,0+γ1,1Psychiatryi+ζ1,i

The coefficients of each variable are listed in Table 3. The following can be interpreted from each coefficient: (1) a higher preceding depressive mood was associated with fewer behaviors, and (2) individuals with comorbid psychiatric disorders had smaller coefficients for preceding depressive mood.

Table 3. Coefficients of the linear mixed-effects model for the daily number of performed behaviors.
Fixed effects coefficient (95% CI)P value
Intercept (γ0,0)4.45 (3.47 to 5.43)<.001
Depression (γ1,0)−1.88 (−2.87 to −0.88)<.001
Depression × psychiatric comorbidity (γ1,1)1.59 (0.34 to 2.85).01

Principal Results

The smartphone app developed in this study for individuals with obesity was used by 20 recruited participants over 4 weeks, with a median use rate of 98.3%. Participants’ BMI decreased significantly during the study period. Furthermore, a linear mixed-effects model based on data obtained through the app showed that a higher preceding depressive mood was associated with a reduced number of completed behaviors related to weight loss.

The median use rate was 98.3%, which exceeded the adherence rates of approximately 80% to 95% reported in relevant studies [20,32,33], indicating sufficient feasibility. Future studies should address the concerns identified in the qualitative interviews. To prevent the selection of behaviors from being monotonous, items that are consistently completed may be retired from the list. In addition, improving the clarity of item explanations may effectively address the challenges in specifying item content.

The median decrease in BMI was 2.3% over 4 weeks. The Japanese clinical guidelines recommend a 3% weight loss for individuals with a BMI of <35 kg/m2 and a 5% to 10% weight loss for those with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m2 over 3 to 6 months [4]. Accordingly, the weight loss achieved in this study appeared sufficient. Calorie intake and weekend sitting time improved, and these behavior changes may have contributed to weight loss. Thus, the developed app may be effective for weight loss.

The effect size should be interpreted with caution due to several features of this study design. Daily weight measurements were conducted throughout the study, which may have influenced weight loss [34]. In total, 15% (3/20) of the participants gained weight during the study, 2 of whom had undergone bariatric surgery, a population known to frequently experience weight regain [35]. A previous umbrella review of smartphone app and web application interventions for obesity showed a mean difference of −0.12 kg compared with face-to-face treatment and −4.32 kg compared with no treatment [16]. However, our study was a single-arm trial with a follow-up duration different from those of previous studies, making direct comparisons difficult. Therefore, further studies are warranted to more accurately determine the effect size of the app developed in this study.

Given the high ratings for the subjective likelihood of achievement of the top-suggested items, with a median of 85 on a scale from 0 to 100, the multiarmed bandit algorithm seemingly approached convergence. Qualitative interviews revealed that the participants tended to choose only a few types of items presented at the top and reported a sense of monotony, further suggesting algorithm convergence. Future studies with more accumulated data should evaluate the convergence of the algorithm and may consider applying other optimization approaches such as collaborative filtering [14]. On the basis of the Fogg behavior model [25], this study prioritized behaviors based solely on completion rates; however, future studies should also consider the behaviors’ contributions to clinical outcomes such as weight loss, along with the effort and duration required for achievement.

In the post hoc analysis, the linear mixed-effects model showed that preceding depressive mood was related to weight loss behaviors. This aligns with a previous study showing that baseline depression is associated with emotional eating and binge eating [22]. One study showed that delay discounting mediates the association between depressive symptoms and the onset of diabetes [36], which may help explain these findings. Another study suggested that individuals with higher levels of depression exhibited unhealthy behaviors such as physical inactivity [37]. On the basis of these findings, future studies may benefit from providing suggestions on the number of behaviors to select on the app and prioritizing lower-effort behaviors according to daily depression levels. The interaction coefficient of depressive mood and psychiatric comorbidity was positive, indicating that, when adjusted for depressive mood as a covariate, the number of behaviors performed was large for individuals with psychiatric diseases. This may suggest that treating psychiatric disorders positively influences weight loss behaviors; however, further studies are needed to interpret these findings.

Limitations and Future Directions

This study has several limitations. First, the study period was short, and long-term use of the app remains unexplored. Second, the dietary and physical activity questionnaires were administered only at baseline and after the intervention, which limited assessment of temporal changes and intervention feasibility. Third, energy intake estimated using the BDHQ appeared low. Alternative assessment tools such as the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall [38] may be preferable in future studies. Fourth, this study used weight alone without distinguishing between fat and muscle mass; this is particularly relevant for participants receiving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or who underwent bariatric surgery. Future studies should assess body composition using tools such as bioelectrical impedance analysis. Fifth, in the optimization algorithm, the behaviors were evaluated only with regard to achievability. Their contributions to weight loss may vary and should ideally be incorporated into the algorithm. Sixth, the impact of the multiarmed bandit algorithm on optimization remains unevaluated. Seventh, the effect size for weight loss was inconclusive in this single-arm study. Finally, the analysis of the relationship between preceding depressive mood and daily behaviors used only the subjective input of behavioral execution.

Future research should improve the app based on the findings of this study and assess the treatment efficacy through a randomized controlled trial with a longer follow-up period. Additionally, future studies should assess the contribution of optimization to weight loss using a randomized design that compares optimized and nonoptimized interventions. Furthermore, although this study used an item-fixed measurement based on classic test theory, future research could use computer-adaptive tests [39,40] to measure mood status more efficiently.

Conclusions

The smartphone app for obesity developed in this study demonstrated sufficient feasibility, and its potential effectiveness for weight loss was suggested. Data obtained through this app indicate that a preceding depressive mood may influence daily behaviors related to weight loss.

Funding

This study was supported by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grants 22K07390 and 25H00388).

Data Availability

The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. González-Muniesa P, Mártinez-González MA, Hu FB, et al. Obesity. Nat Rev Dis Primers. Jun 15, 2017;3:17034. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Avila C, Holloway AC, Hahn MK, et al. An overview of links between obesity and mental health. Curr Obes Rep. Sep 2015;4(3):303-310. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Cameron AJ, Magliano DJ, Dunstan DW, et al. A bi-directional relationship between obesity and health-related quality of life: evidence from the longitudinal AusDiab study. Int J Obes (Lond). Feb 2012;36(2):295-303. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Guidelines for the management of obesity disease 2022. Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. Life Science Publishing; 2022. URL: https://www.jasso.or.jp/contents/magazine/journal.html#himan22 [Accessed 2025-05-25]
  5. Elmaleh-Sachs A, Schwartz JL, Bramante CT, Nicklas JM, Gudzune KA, Jay M. Obesity management in adults: a review. JAMA. Nov 28, 2023;330(20):2000-2015. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Maciejewski ML, Smith VA, Berkowitz TSZ, et al. Association of bariatric surgical procedures with changes in unhealthy alcohol use among US veterans. JAMA Netw Open. Dec 1, 2020;3(12):e2028117. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Konttinen H, Sjöholm K, Jacobson P, Svensson PA, Carlsson LMS, Peltonen M. Prediction of suicide and nonfatal self-harm after bariatric surgery: a risk score based on sociodemographic factors, lifestyle behavior, and mental health: a nonrandomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. Aug 1, 2021;274(2):339-345. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Ard JD, Lewis KH, Moore JB. Lifestyle interventions for obesity in the era of GLP-1 receptor agonists. JAMA. Jul 2, 2024;332(1):16-18. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Dalle Grave R, Sartirana M, El Ghoch M. Treatment overview. In: Treating Obesity with Personalized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Springer; 2018. [CrossRef] ISBN: 9783319914978
  10. Dalle Grave R, Sartirana M, Calugi S. Personalized cognitive-behavioural therapy for obesity (CBT-OB): theory, strategies and procedures. Biopsychosoc Med. 2020;14:5. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Reilly MP, Lattal KA. Within-session delay-of-reinforcement gradients. J Exp Anal Behav. Jul 2004;82(1):21-35. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Heron KE, Smyth JM. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol. Feb 2010;15(Pt 1):1-39. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Kim J, Marcusson-Clavertz D, Yoshiuchi K, Smyth JM. Potential benefits of integrating ecological momentary assessment data into mHealth care systems. Biopsychosoc Med. 2019;13:19. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Agarwal DK, Chen BC. Statistical Methods for Recommender Systems. Cambridge University Press; 2016. ISBN: 9781139565868
  15. Rabbi M, Pfammatter A, Zhang M, Spring B, Choudhury T. Automated personalized feedback for physical activity and dietary behavior change with mobile phones: a randomized controlled trial on adults. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. May 14, 2015;3(2):e42. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Kupila SKE, Joki A, Suojanen LU, Pietiläinen KH. The effectiveness of eHealth interventions for weight loss and weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Curr Obes Rep. Sep 2023;12(3):371-394. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Bond DS, Thomas JG, Raynor HA, et al. B-MOBILE--a smartphone-based intervention to reduce sedentary time in overweight/obese individuals: a within-subjects experimental trial. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(6):e100821. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Finkelstein J, Bedra M, Li X, Wood J, Ouyang P. Mobile app to reduce inactivity in sedentary overweight women. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:89-92. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Forman EM, Goldstein SP, Crochiere RJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of OnTrack, a just-in-time adaptive intervention designed to enhance weight loss. Transl Behav Med. Nov 25, 2019;9(6):989-1001. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Klasnja P, Rosenberg DE, Zhou J, Anau J, Gupta A, Arterburn DE. A quality-improvement optimization pilot of BariFit, a mobile health intervention to promote physical activity after bariatric surgery. Transl Behav Med. Mar 16, 2021;11(2):530-539. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Bond DS, Thomas JG, Ryder BA, Vithiananthan S, Pohl D, Wing RR. Ecological momentary assessment of the relationship between intention and physical activity behavior in bariatric surgery patients. Int J Behav Med. Mar 2013;20(1):82-87. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Goldschmidt AB, Crosby RD, Engel SG, et al. Affect and eating behavior in obese adults with and without elevated depression symptoms. Int J Eat Disord. Apr 2014;47(3):281-286. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Goldschmidt AB, Crosby RD, Cao L, et al. Ecological momentary assessment of eating episodes in obese adults. Psychosom Med. 2014;76(9):747-752. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Williams-Kerver GA, Steffen KJ, Smith KE, Cao L, Crosby RD, Engel SG. Negative affect and loss of control eating among bariatric surgery patients: an ecological momentary assessment pilot investigation. Obes Surg. Jun 2020;30(6):2382-2387. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Fogg BJ. A behavior model for persuasive design. Presented at: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology; Apr 26-29, 2009. [CrossRef]
  26. Home page. DeployGate. URL: https://deploygate.com [Accessed 2025-05-03]
  27. Ogawa W, Hirota Y, Miyazaki S, et al. Definition, criteria, and core concepts of guidelines for the management of obesity disease in Japan. Endocr J. Mar 28, 2024;71(3):223-231. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Murase N, Katsumura T, Ueda C, Inoue S, Shimomitsu T. Validity and reliability of Japanese version of international physical activity questionnaire. J Health Welf Stat. 2002;49(11):1-9. URL: https://www.hws-kyokai.or.jp/images/ronbun/all/200210-1.pdf [Accessed 2025-05-03]
  29. Kobayashi S, Honda S, Murakami K, et al. Both comprehensive and brief self-administered diet history questionnaires satisfactorily rank nutrient intakes in Japanese adults. J Epidemiol. 2012;22(2):151-159. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Fukui I. The depression and anxiety mood scale (DAMS) – scale development and validation. Jpn J Behav Ther. 1997;23:83-93. [CrossRef]
  31. HN-300T2. OMRON. URL: https:/​/web.​archive.org/​web/​20240727121219/​https:/​/www.​healthcare.omron.co.jp/​product/​hbf/​hn-300t2.​html [Accessed 2026-2-13]
  32. Thomas JG, Wing RR. Health-e-call, a smartphone-assisted behavioral obesity treatment: pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Apr 17, 2013;1(1):e3. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  33. Inada S, Yoshiuchi K, Iizuka Y, et al. Pilot study for the development of a self-care system for type 2 diabetes patients using a personal digital assistant (PDA). Int J Behav Med. Jun 2016;23(3):295-299. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Zheng Y, Klem ML, Sereika SM, Danford CA, Ewing LJ, Burke LE. Self-weighing in weight management: a systematic literature review. Obesity (Silver Spring). Feb 2015;23(2):256-265. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  35. Lauti M, Kularatna M, Hill AG, MacCormick AD. Weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy-a systematic review. Obes Surg. Jun 2016;26(6):1326-1334. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Kurisu K, DeAngelis BN, Yoshiuchi K, al’Absi M. Mediating role of delay discounting in the link between depressive symptoms and diabetes onset: findings from a prospective survey of a community sample. Int J Behav Med. Oct 2025;32(5):678-686. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Strine TW, Mokdad AH, Dube SR, et al. The association of depression and anxiety with obesity and unhealthy behaviors among community-dwelling US adults. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(2):127-137. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Kirkpatrick SI, Subar AF, Douglass D, et al. Performance of the automated self-administered 24-hour recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am J Clin Nutr. Jul 2014;100(1):233-240. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Kurisu K, Hashimoto M, Ishizawa T, et al. Development of computer adaptive testing for measuring depression in patients with cancer. Sci Rep. May 17, 2022;12(1):8247. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  40. Horie T, Kurisu K, Inada S, et al. Development of computer adaptive tests to assess the psychological status of individuals with an eating disorder or type 2 diabetes. Biopsychosoc Med. Feb 14, 2025;19(1):2. [CrossRef] [Medline]


BDHQ: brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire
EMI: ecological momentary intervention
IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire


Edited by Andre Kushniruk; submitted 11.May.2025; peer-reviewed by Neda S Akhavan, Suraj Kath; final revised version received 06.Jan.2026; accepted 13.Jan.2026; published 26.Feb.2026.

Copyright

© Ken Kurisu, Yoshiharu Yamamoto, Tomohisa Aoyama, Toshimasa Yamauchi, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 26.Feb.2026.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.