Search Articles

View query in Help articles search
e.g. John Smith or 0000-0001-6479-5330

Search Results (1 to 10 of 12 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS

Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Experience Measures Within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review

Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Experience Measures Within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review

The part dealing with the assessment of telemedicine applications is based on a review by Arnold and Scheibe et al [4], which aimed to identify standards for the evaluation of telemedicine applications. The part of the search string covering PROMs and PREMs is based on the PROM Group Construct and Instrument Type Filters of the University of Oxford [17]. This search string has already proven itself in the design of other reviews [18,19]. The search query was performed on April 2, 2020.

Andreas Knapp, Lorenz Harst, Stefan Hager, Jochen Schmitt, Madlen Scheibe

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(11):e30042

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML
Article has an altmetric score of 15

Theories Predicting End-User Acceptance of Telemedicine Use: Systematic Review

Theories Predicting End-User Acceptance of Telemedicine Use: Systematic Review

Scheibe et al show that design features, such as simple, intuitive menus, large icons and high color contrasts, are especially important for older users [70]. As time is always scarce in health care provision, easy-to-use technology is also important for health care providers. De Angelis et al can even show that health care providers are willing to disseminate health information via Facebook, mainly as the Social Network is easy to use [71].

Lorenz Harst, Hendrikje Lantzsch, Madlen Scheibe

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(5):e13117

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML
Article has an altmetric score of 7