e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 7 of 7 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 5 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Reassessing AI in Medicine: Exploring the Capabilities of AI in Academic Abstract Synthesis
We propose that employing Chat GPT in a “layered progressive” manner for text generation could address this issue. This method involves dividing an article into smaller sections, having Chat GPT summarize each section individually, and then compiling these summaries into a cohesive whole. Such an approach is likely to yield better results than generating a summary from the entire text.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55920
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Ability of ChatGPT in Paraphrasing Texts and Reducing Plagiarism: A Descriptive Analysis
Importantly, the text produced by Chat GPT may sometimes bypass conventional plagiarism checks due to its unique generation process, which is a rising ethical concern [10]. Earlier, many researchers were reporting Chat GPT as co-authors in papers but the majority of journals promptly updated their policies to forbid this practice as Chat GPT cannot be held accountable for the generated content [11].
JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e53308
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Our research, in contrast, stands out by probing the reproducibility of note generation—a relatively less explored topic in existing literature.
The PDQI-9 scores also highlight the overall variance in quality. In previous research, the PDQI-9 score of 26.2 was rated “terrible or bad,” versus a PDQI-9 score of 36.6, which was rated “good or excellent” [13]. In our study, the mean PDQI-9 score of 29.7 is closer to the “terrible or bad” range.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e54419
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Temperature Feature of ChatGPT: Modifying Creativity for Clinical Research
generation
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e53559
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The generation that followed the Baby Boomers, Generation X, is described as the “don't bother me“ generation, which has withdrawn into private life [34] after the political turbulence of the 1960s, which were run by the generation before. Research considered this generation to be the ”driving force behind“ new media developments, especially the internet [36]. Nevertheless, research focusing on the social media use of this generation remains scarce [37].
J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e20528
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS