e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 110 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 45 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 13 JMIR Medical Education
- 10 JMIR Formative Research
- 10 JMIR Human Factors
- 7 JMIR Mental Health
- 5 JMIR Dermatology
- 4 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 4 JMIR Research Protocols
- 4 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 3 JMIR AI
- 2 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Our pilot study compares AI chatbot responses to potential patient questions, with the primary goal of comparing the utility of three chatbots by assessing their strengths and weaknesses. As suggested by Parker, recommending the usage of AI in place of existing patient education materials would require a larger, more robust investigation that compares AI to existing resources.
JMIR Dermatol 2025;8:e72540
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
chatbotsChatbots and Conversational Agents
JMIR Dermatol 2025;8:e71768
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Finally, Yang et al [10] pointed to the high potential that medical chatbots have in clinical settings, while Gilbert et al [11] warned of the need to extensively test health care chatbots.
However, current methods of creating and evaluating early-stage health care bots face steep development costs due to the high level of human involvement in each phase of the development process. In this study, we present a novel, bot-driven method of developing, testing, and evaluating automated health care chatbots.
JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e63058
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
One key limitation is the need for further evidence to confirm the long-term effectiveness of mental health chatbots through trials replicated with longer durations and exploration of the chatbots’ efficacy in comparison with other active controls [13-15].
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e64396
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
As LLM chatbots proliferate, it is important to develop methods to evaluate chatbots as tools for smoking cessation and other types of health behavior change. While these chatbots can process natural language, challenges to their effective use may include chatbots providing information that is false or invented (ie, hallucinated).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66896
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The proportion of medical health–related knowledge obtained through the internet is large, and chatbots are also used to answer various medical questions [9,10]. Researchers have performed many evaluations and studies on chatbots to answer medical questions, including ophthalmology, pediatric, urology, dentistry, and other professional directions, involving myopia, cirrhosis, hypertension, obesity, and other diseases and medical examination questions [11,12].
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e63924
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
One such delivery method is using conversational agents, more commonly known as chatbots. Chatbots may provide a potential alternative and highly engaging method to deliver such interventions. Chatbots are text-based automated conversational agents that give the impression of speaking to a human, although the user is aware beforehand, that they are speaking with a computer program. They may use machine learning and respond to user inputs or use a decision tree format with users following a defined path.
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e54585
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A total of 5 board-certified emergency faculty (EH, MIL, JSR, JS, and WW) validated the completeness and accuracy of each response to these 10 questions from the 4 chatbots.
We assessed the reliability of chatbots for emergency medical advice with a standardized grading rubric to mitigate evaluator bias and enhance objectivity.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e60291
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Exploring the Role of Mobile Apps for Insomnia in Depression: Systematic Review
in improving sleep quality and insomnia symptoms, and the effectiveness of chatbots in improving depression and its symptoms); Operating platforms (eg, Android, i OS, Android and i OS, multiplatform support, and unreported operating platforms); Technical foundation and feature characteristics (eg, AI chatbots, the Expi Well app, RASA-based open-source conversational AI); and Feasibility and acceptability (ie, the acceptability and feasibility of chatbots, mobile apps as sleep intervention tools, and mobile apps
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e51110
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In a newsmagazine article, the AI scholar Lance Eliot has highlighted the importance of evaluating Gen AI chatbots based on their degree of autonomy [16] understood as level of independence from human oversight. Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perpetuate harmful biases [1,17-20], and therefore, Pfohl et al [21] have stressed the need to systematically assess this important risk.
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e62963
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS