Published on in Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Jan-Jun

Sociotechnical Human Factors Involved in Remote Online Usability Testing of Two eHealth Interventions

Sociotechnical Human Factors Involved in Remote Online Usability Testing of Two eHealth Interventions

Sociotechnical Human Factors Involved in Remote Online Usability Testing of Two eHealth Interventions

Journals

  1. Yuhui W, Tian L, Xinxiong L. Reliability of Perceived Usability Assessment via Crowdsourcing Platform: Retrospective Analysis and Novel Feedback Quality Inspection Method. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2020;36(11):1070 View
  2. Dimaguila G, Gray K, Merolli M. Enabling Better Use of Person-Generated Health Data in Stroke Rehabilitation Systems: Systematic Development of Design Heuristics. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(7):e17132 View
  3. Sinabell I, Ammenwerth E. Challenges and recommendations for eHealth usability evaluation with elderly users: systematic review and case study. Universal Access in the Information Society 2024;23(1):455 View
  4. Shields C, Cunningham S, Wake D, Fioratou E, Brodie D, Philip S, Conway N. User-Centered Design of A Novel Risk Prediction Behavior Change Tool Augmented With an Artificial Intelligence Engine (MyDiabetesIQ): A Sociotechnical Systems Approach. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(1):e29973 View
  5. Lobchuk M, Bathi P, Ademeyo A, Livingston A. Remote Moderator and Observer Experiences and Decision-making During Usability Testing of a Web-Based Empathy Training Portal: Content Analysis. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(8):e35319 View
  6. Shah J, DePietro B, D'Adamo L, Firebaugh M, Laing O, Fowler L, Smolar L, Sadeh‐Sharvit S, Taylor C, Wilfley D, Fitzsimmons‐Craft E. Development and usability testing of a chatbot to promote mental health services use among individuals with eating disorders following screening. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2022;55(9):1229 View
  7. Wang Y, Chen X, Zhou X. A New Method for Identifying Low-Quality Data in Perceived Usability Crowdsourcing Tests: Differences in Questionnaire Scores. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024;40(22):7297 View