This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Reviews on Human Factors (39) Digital Health Reviews (1002) Design and Usability of Websites for Special User Groups (93) Methods in Human Factors Research (36) Usability and Technology Use Studies with Elder Subjects (113)

Published on in Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Jan-Mar

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/22774, first published .
Procedures of User-Centered Usability Assessment for Digital Solutions: Scoping Review of Reviews Reporting on Digital Solutions Relevant for Older Adults

Procedures of User-Centered Usability Assessment for Digital Solutions: Scoping Review of Reviews Reporting on Digital Solutions Relevant for Older Adults

Procedures of User-Centered Usability Assessment for Digital Solutions: Scoping Review of Reviews Reporting on Digital Solutions Relevant for Older Adults

Authors of this article:

Anabela G Silva 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hilma Caravau 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ana Martins 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ana Margarida Pisco Almeida 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Telmo Silva 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Óscar Ribeiro 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Gonçalo Santinha 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Nelson P Rocha 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Diehl C, Martins A, Almeida A, Silva T, Ribeiro Ó, Santinha G, Rocha N, Silva A. Defining Recommendations to Guide User Interface Design: Multimethod Approach. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(3):e37894 View
  2. Bendig J, Spanz A, Leidig J, Frank A, Stahr M, Reichmann H, Loewenbrück K, Falkenburger B. Measuring the Usability of eHealth Solutions for Patients With Parkinson Disease: Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(10):e39954 View
  3. Bastardo R, Martins A, Pavão J, Silva A, Rocha N. Methodological Quality of User-Centered Usability Evaluation of Ambient Assisted Living Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11507 View
  4. Frost A, Golijani-Moghaddam N, Burge R, Dawson D, Evangelou N, Roche B, Turton J, Hawton A, Law G, Rowan E, das Nair R. Usability and acceptability of a cognitive training intervention (SMART) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS): A prefeasibility formative evaluation. NIHR Open Research 2022;2:39 View
  5. Martins A, Santinha G, Almeida A, Ribeiro Ó, Silva T, Rocha N, Silva A. Consensus on the Terms and Procedures for Planning and Reporting a Usability Evaluation of Health-Related Digital Solutions: Delphi Study and a Resulting Checklist. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e44326 View
  6. Guerreiro M, Balsa J, Carmo M, Cláudio A, Félix I. Usability Evaluation by Primary Care Providers of a Novel Digital Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management in Older Adults. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2023;41(4):185 View
  7. Alves Leite de Barros K, da Silva Praxedes M, Pinho Ribeiro A, Parreiras Martins M. Effect and usability of mobile health applications for medication adherence in patients with heart failure: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2023;178:105206 View
  8. Bergschöld J, Gunnes M, Eide A, Lassemo E. The characteristics and range of reviews about technologies for ageing in place: a scoping review of reviews (Preprint). JMIR Aging 2023 View
  9. Arigo D, Lassiter J, Baga K, Jackson D, Lobo A, Guetterman T. “You get what you need when you need it”: A mixed methods examination of the feasibility and acceptability of a tailored digital tool to promote physical activity among women in midlife. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Štiglic G, Braam K, Carmo M, Correia L, Gosak L, Lorber M, Pimenta N, Cláudio A. A Practical Guide on Behaviour Change Support for Self-Managing Chronic Disease. View