This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Reviews on Human Factors (53) Digital Health Reviews (1326) Design and Usability of Websites for Special User Groups (171) Methods in Human Factors Research (44) Usability and Technology Use Studies with Elder Subjects (195)

Published on in Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Jan-Mar

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/22774, first published .
Procedures of User-Centered Usability Assessment for Digital Solutions: Scoping Review of Reviews Reporting on Digital Solutions Relevant for Older Adults

Procedures of User-Centered Usability Assessment for Digital Solutions: Scoping Review of Reviews Reporting on Digital Solutions Relevant for Older Adults

Procedures of User-Centered Usability Assessment for Digital Solutions: Scoping Review of Reviews Reporting on Digital Solutions Relevant for Older Adults

Authors of this article:

Anabela G Silva1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hilma Caravau2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ana Martins2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ana Margarida Pisco Almeida3 Author Orcid Image ;   Telmo Silva3 Author Orcid Image ;   Óscar Ribeiro4 Author Orcid Image ;   Gonçalo Santinha5 Author Orcid Image ;   Nelson P Rocha2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (16) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Diehl C, Martins A, Almeida A, Silva T, Ribeiro Ó, Santinha G, Rocha N, Silva A. Defining Recommendations to Guide User Interface Design: Multimethod Approach. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(3):e37894 View
  2. Bendig J, Spanz A, Leidig J, Frank A, Stahr M, Reichmann H, Loewenbrück K, Falkenburger B. Measuring the Usability of eHealth Solutions for Patients With Parkinson Disease: Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(10):e39954 View
  3. Bastardo R, Martins A, Pavão J, Silva A, Rocha N. Methodological Quality of User-Centered Usability Evaluation of Ambient Assisted Living Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11507 View
  4. Frost A, Golijani-Moghaddam N, Burge R, Dawson D, Evangelou N, Roche B, Turton J, Hawton A, Law G, Rowan E, das Nair R. Usability and acceptability of a cognitive training intervention (SMART) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS): A prefeasibility formative evaluation. NIHR Open Research 2022;2:39 View
  5. Martins A, Santinha G, Almeida A, Ribeiro Ó, Silva T, Rocha N, Silva A. Consensus on the Terms and Procedures for Planning and Reporting a Usability Evaluation of Health-Related Digital Solutions: Delphi Study and a Resulting Checklist. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e44326 View
  6. Guerreiro M, Balsa J, Carmo M, Cláudio A, Félix I. Usability Evaluation by Primary Care Providers of a Novel Digital Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management in Older Adults. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2023;41(4):185 View
  7. Alves Leite de Barros K, da Silva Praxedes M, Pinho Ribeiro A, Parreiras Martins M. Effect and usability of mobile health applications for medication adherence in patients with heart failure: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2023;178:105206 View
  8. Bergschöld J, Gunnes M, Eide A, Lassemo E. Characteristics and Range of Reviews About Technologies for Aging in Place: Scoping Review of Reviews. JMIR Aging 2024;7:e50286 View
  9. Arigo D, Lassiter J, Baga K, Jackson D, Lobo A, Guetterman T. “You get what you need when you need it”: A mixed methods examination of the feasibility and acceptability of a tailored digital tool to promote physical activity among women in midlife. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  10. Chapman R, Zeissler M, Meinert E, Mullin S, Whipps S, Whipps J, Hockey K, Hockey P, Carroll C. Incorporating usability evaluation into iterative development of an online platform to support research participation in Parkinson’s disease: a mixed methods protocol. BMJ Open 2023;13(12):e078638 View
  11. Kearney L, Jansen E, Kathuria H, Steiling K, Jones K, Walkey A, Cordella N. Efficacy of Digital Outreach Strategies for Collecting Smoking Data: Pragmatic Randomized Trial. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e50465 View
  12. Pauls A, Koppelin F, Zeeb H. The participation of hard-to-reach older people in the research and development process of health technologies from the perspective of multipliers—A qualitative analysis. Frontiers in Public Health 2024;12 View
  13. Bastardo R, Pavão J, Rocha N. Methodological Quality of User-Centered Usability Evaluation of Digital Applications to Promote Citizens’ Engagement and Participation in Public Governance: A Systematic Literature Review. Digital 2024;4(3):740 View
  14. Son A, Kim W, Park J, Park Y, Lee W, Lee S, Kim H. Mass Spectrometry Advancements and Applications for Biomarker Discovery, Diagnostic Innovations, and Personalized Medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024;25(18):9880 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Štiglic G, Braam K, Carmo M, Correia L, Gosak L, Lorber M, Pimenta N, Cláudio A. A Practical Guide on Behaviour Change Support for Self-Managing Chronic Disease. View