e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
French Version of the User Mobile Application Rating Scale: Adaptation and Validation Study
Therefore, the same team of authors developed the end-user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (u MARS), which is a valid and objective tool that can be used by end users with different levels of education or by researchers working with end users to evaluate and assess the quality of m Health apps from end-user perspective [23]. This scale is available in English (u MARS) [23], Spanish (u MARS-S) [24], Italian (u MARS-I) [25], Japanese (u MARS-J) [26], Turkish (u MARS-T) [27], and Greek (u MARS-G) [28].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e63776
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps in the Spanish App Stores: Quality and Content Analysis
The user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (u MARS) was used to evaluate the quality of the apps [30]. The u MARS is an adaptation of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) developed for end users, while the MARS is used by professionals who require training and expertise in m Health in order to perform the assessment [31]. The u MARS is composed of 4 objective sections, each containing multiple items: engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e52424
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Nutrition Management Miniprograms in WeChat: Evaluation of Functionality and Quality
As a comprehensive tool for evaluating the user experience of mobile apps, the u MARS was commonly used to gauge usability, user satisfaction, functionality, and other pertinent factors [13]. The 5 dimensions of the u MARS are engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, and subjective quality, each dimension encompassing 3‐5 questions and each question scored on a scale of 0-5 points (20 items in total) [14,15].
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e56486
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
User quality ratings data were collected using the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (u MARS) [4].
There were twice as many recruited female participants (n=26) as male participants (n=13). Co-researchers were older (mean 13.8, SD 0.4 years) than pilot study participants (mean 12.7, SD 0.4 years). Most co-researchers used the app for 5-10 minutes (8/15, 53%); most pilot study participants used it every day or on most days (13/24, 55%).
JMIR Dermatol 2022;5(3):e35203
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (u MARS): patients completed u MARS at 12 weeks after using the NEVERMIND system. u MARS is the adapted end-user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale, a scale for digital health experts that measures how good a mobile health app is in different dimensions. u MARS measures the app quality by measuring engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information, to design and develop high-quality mobile apps [20].
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(6):e33734
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS