This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Design and Usability of Websites for Special User Groups (161) Design and Formative Evaluation of Mobile Apps (694) Text-messaging (SMS, WeChat etc)-Based Interventions (650) Super-Apps, Technology, and Health Prevention for Asian/Pacific Islands (4) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2939)

Published on in Vol 11 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/56486, first published .
Nutrition Management Miniprograms in WeChat: Evaluation of Functionality and Quality

Nutrition Management Miniprograms in WeChat: Evaluation of Functionality and Quality

Nutrition Management Miniprograms in WeChat: Evaluation of Functionality and Quality

Authors of this article:

Hui Sun1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yanping Wu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jia Sun2 Author Orcid Image ;   Wu Zhou1 Author Orcid Image ;   Qian Xu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Dandan Hu1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

    1School of Medicine, Southeast University, , No.87 Dingjiaqiao, Hunan Road, Naning, , China

    2The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, , Lianyungang, , China

    Corresponding Author:

    Yanping Wu, MSN


    Background: With the rise in people’s living standards and aging populations, a heightened emphasis has been placed in the field of medical and health care. In recent years, there has been a drastic increase in nutrition management in domestic research circles. The mobile nutritional health management platform based on WeChat miniprograms has been widely used to promote health and self-management and to monitor individual nutritional health status in China. Nevertheless, there has been a lack of comprehensive scientific evaluation regarding the functionality and quality of the diverse range of nutritional miniprograms that have surfaced in the market.

    Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the functionality and quality of China’s WeChat nutrition management miniprogram by using the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS).

    Methods: This observational study involves quantitative methods. A keyword search for “nutrition,” “diet,” “food,” and “meal” in Chinese or English was conducted on WeChat, and all miniprograms pertaining to these keywords were thoroughly analyzed. Then, basic information including name, registration date, update date, service type, user scores, and functional scores was extracted from January 2017 to November 2023. Rating scores were provided by users based on their experience and satisfaction with the use of the WeChat miniprogram, and functional scores were integrated and summarized for the primary functions of each miniprogram. Moreover, the quality of nutrition management applets was evaluated by 3 researchers independently using the uMARS.

    Results: Initially, 27 of 891 miniprograms identified were relevant to nutrition management. Among them, 85.2% (23/27) of them offered features for diet management, facilitating recording of daily dietary intake to evaluate nutritional status; 70.4% (19/27) provided resources for nutrition education and classroom instruction; 59.3% (16/27) included functionalities for exercise management, allowing users to record daily physical activity; and only 44.4% (12/27) featured components for weight management. The total quality score on the uMARS ranged 2.85-3.88 (median 3.38, IQR 3.14-3.57). Engagement scores on the uMARS varied from 2.00 to 4.33 (median 3.00, IQR 2.67-3.67). Functional dimension scores ranged from 3.00 to 4.00 (median 3.33, IQR 3.33-3.67), with a lower score of 2.67 and a higher score of 4.33 outside the reference range. Aesthetic dimension scores ranged from 2.33 to 4.67 (median 3.67, IQR 3.33-4.00). Informational dimension scores ranged from 2.33 to 4.67 (median 3.33, IQR 2.67-3.67).

    Conclusions: Our findings from the uMARS highlight a predominant emphasis on health aspects over nutritional specifications in the app supporting WeChat miniprograms related to nutrition management. The quality of these miniprograms is currently at an average level, with considerable room for functional improvements in the future.

    JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e56486

    doi:10.2196/56486

    Keywords

    nutrition management; WeChat mini-program; User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale; uMARS; function and quality evaluation 


    With the intensification of the population’s aging tendency, people pay increasing attention to the health of older adults. Specifically, nutrition management is of paramount importance for older adults, in that nutritional needs not only impact their quality of life but also significantly influence overall health status [1]. Aging, a normal process, is accompanied by physiological changes such as a loss of muscle mass, reduction in bone density, and decline in metabolic rate; Therefore, it is of vital importance to adjust nutritional intake among older individuals, especially those with weak digestive systems [2].

    Malnutrition among older adults is a significant universal concern. Senile malnutrition, characterized by inadequate and imbalanced nutrition, arises from various factors, such as inappropriate dietary choices, insufficient intake, absorption disorders, etc [3]. The aging demographic shift contributes to a rise in the population of older adults, and the health status of the older adults directly impacts societal sustainability [4]. Consequently, there is an urgent need for effective nutrition policies and intervening measures for older adults. Among them, nutrition education, promotion of a balanced diet, optimization of medical and health care systems are essential strategies to prevent and improve senile malnutrition [5].

    Thus far, the government has issued a series of policies, including the “Healthy China 2030 Plan Outline,” which emphasizes the promotion of self-disciplined health behaviors and encourages balanced diets. Concurrently, the National Nutrition Plan (2017-2030) advocates for the integration of “Internet+nutrition and health” [6], endorsing the use of technology to manage public health and nutrition. Nowadays, this shift toward digital health management and intelligent nutrition support system for older adults reassure the growing emphasis on leveraging science and technology in health care. Through internet platforms and mobile apps, the dietary habits of older adults can be more effectively monitored, and personalized dietary recommendations can be provided to identify and address possible malnutrition issues promptly [7]. WeChat, an instant messaging software for smart terminals, was launched by Tencent on January 21, 2011, and it emerged in 2017 with its distinct advantages, including user-friendly miniprograms that do not require downloading, occupy minimal mobile phone memory, and include payment capabilities, circles of friends, public platforms, WeChat miniprograms, and other functionalities. All these features have contributed greatly to its widespread adoption among users [8].

    Despite the growing number of mobile apps for nutrition guidance, there is remarkable variability among them due to a lack of specificity. Studies in China have predominantly focused on exploring the effects of interventions and the significance of nutrition research; yet, there remains a notable absence of scientific evaluation regarding the functionality and quality of commercially available nutrition miniprograms [9,10]. Accordingly, this study aimed to carry out a comprehensive search and assessment of relevant miniprograms using the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) and develop WeChat-based applets for nutrition management.


    Search Strategy

    A keyword search for “nutrition,” “diet,” “food,” and “meal” in Chinese or English was independently conducted on WeChat by 2 researchers, and all miniprograms pertaining to these keywords were thoroughly analyzed. They personally experienced the relevant miniprograms registered on WeChat between January 2017 and November 2023. Screening for miniprograms strictly adhered to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the miniprogram’s functional content pertained to diet and nutrition, (2) it was available for free use, (3) its content was written in Chinese or English, and (4) it was compatible with mobile phones or tablets. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) it was never updated or maintained, (2) it was designed for commercial ordering and canteen services, (3) it was specifically for purchasing food, (4) it solely records data. During the screening process, the 2 researchers resorted to another researcher, if necessary, to resolve any discrepancies.

    Sample Size

    In this study, an observational research design was adopted to systematically search and quantitatively evaluate the function and quality of nutrition management miniprograms on WeChat. Using keywords such as “nutrition,” “diet,” “food,” and “meal,” a total of 891 miniprograms were initially identified. These miniprograms were then screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the screening process, 27 eligible miniprograms were selected for detailed analysis.

    Quality Assessment of WeChat Miniprograms Related to Nutrition Management

    As described in a previous study [11], the uMARS was originally developed as an end user evaluation tool based on the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS), and it has been widely used for evaluating diverse categories of mobile health apps, which include those focusing on weight loss and nutrition, as well as the management of conditions such as rheumatism and ankylosing spondylitis [12].

    As a comprehensive tool for evaluating the user experience of mobile apps, the uMARS was commonly used to gauge usability, user satisfaction, functionality, and other pertinent factors [13]. The 5 dimensions of the uMARS are engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, and subjective quality, each dimension encompassing 3‐5 questions and each question scored on a scale of 0-5 points (20 items in total) [14,15]. In the engagement dimension, the evaluator can evaluate the miniprogram’s entertainment value, level of interest, customization, interactivity, and target audience appeal. The functional dimension facilitates the evaluation of performance, ease of use, navigation, and gesture design. The aesthetics section focuses on layout, graphics quality, and visual appeal, and the information section assesses information quality, quantity visual information, and the credibility of the information source [16-18]. Notably, to ensure evaluation consistency, the subjective scale is not included in the assessment process due to the highly subjective nature of evaluators’ personal opinions and preferences.

    Participants

    Evaluation of the uMARS was conducted independently by 2 nutrition experts and 1 experiencer. Before the evaluation, each evaluator was required to read and further familiarize themselves with dimensions and items of the scale. All evaluators must comply with the consensus of the scoring criteria reached by the group discussion and evaluate each applet independently.

    User Scores

    User scores, a built-in feature of WeChat applets, are intended to assess users’ overall satisfaction and experience, and a 5-point satisfaction scale is commonly used to measure people’s satisfaction levels with the applets for research and surveys. Developers use these ratings to gauge the satisfaction levels of existing users and identify any areas for enhancement. If a feature of a WeChat miniprogram is not properly activated or if no users have participated in the rating, the default rating is set to 0.

    Functional Scores

    From among the 27 miniprograms selected, 16 functions were identified on the basis of registration and usage. Each miniprogram’s functionality was evaluated by assigning 1 point for each aspect assessed, contributing to the cumulative total score. Feature scores ranged from 0 to 16, illustrating the comprehensiveness of the miniprograms’ features.

    Data Collection

    Basic information regarding the 27 selected miniprograms was collected, encompassing metrics such as name, registration date, update date, service type, user scores, and functional scores. Subsequently, the functionality and quality of these miniprograms were quantitatively assessed using the uMARS.

    Statistical Analyses

    The functional score of each miniprogram was collected and expressed as quantity and percentage values. uMARS scores were described as mean and SD or IQR values. All data were analyzed using SPSS (version 26.0; IBM Corp).

    Ethical Considerations

    This study was approved by Zhongda Hospital affiliated to Southeast University (2024ZDSYLL194-P01).


    Screening of Miniprograms for Nutrition Management

    We identified 891 miniprograms based on search terms (Figure 1). After removing the duplicate and unrelated miniprograms, 112 miniprograms were filtered. Ultimately, 27 miniprograms met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for further study.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Flowchart for screening of nutrition management miniprograms.

    Characteristics of Nutrition Management Miniprograms

    We conducted a thorough search for miniprograms related to nutrition management through WeChat and used them after registration. Interestingly, these miniprograms shared several common characteristics, including name, registration date, update date, service type, user scores, and functional scores (Table 1).

    Table 1. Characteristics of the nutrition- related WeChat mini-programsa.
    NameRegistration dateUpdate dateService typeUser scoresFunctional scores
    Peppermint nutritionistNov 15, 2018Feb 10, 2023Health management, medical information, food and beverage, and health products—b10
    YOU nutritionApr 17, 2020Nov 3, 2023Health management, health care products, food and beverage, drug information display, and medical equipment sales platform59
    The more accurate and nutritious the dietOct 12, 2021Nov 2, 2023Food and beverage and health products4.66
    Long light nutrition diet therapyJul 19, 2021Nov 2, 2023Web-based education, educational information services, and medical information—7
    Nutrition pagodaSep 14, 2022Mar 10, 2023Health management3.67
    Little Ann dietitianJan 15, 2021Nov 4, 2023Health management and equipment management4.66
    Abbott Medical Nutrition CareSep 18, 2019Oct 28, 2023Health management4.55
    Peppermint nutrition ProDec 10, 2018Jan 10, 2023Health management3.74
    Nutritionist worldAug 12, 2022Nov 2, 2023Health care products and food and beverage3.54
    Nutritional meal companionJul 9, 2022Oct 28, 2023Catering information service—6
    Better One Nutritional fat reductionJan 19, 2022Oct 28, 2023Beauty service—6
    Nutrition weight loss service platformAug 28, 2023Nov 4, 2023Health management and web-based fitness—8
    Carkaka |Meal control card assistantFeb 17, 2023Oct 26, 2023Recipe drinks, community/forum, and health management4.16
    High uric acid dietOct 27, 2017Nov 6, 2023Information inquiry, health management, and community/forum4.36
    Food diaryMar 8, 2020Nov 1, 2023Catering information service and medical information4.73
    AI Dietary dietitianDec 5, 2022Nov 6, 2023Information query, video customer service, and health management—6
    Little Doctor’s diet diaryNov 10, 2022Jul 10, 2023Health data statistics—5
    High potassium dietDec 22, 2017Nov 5, 2023Information inquiry, health management, and community/forum4.66
    Chestnut food diaryNov 27, 2018Oct 28, 2023Health management and medical information4.38
    Dietary caloriesOct 4, 2021Sep 12, 2023Information inquiry, food and beverage information service, and health management4.25
    Low carb diet assistantJun 21, 2019Nov 12, 2022Health management4.44
    Diet evaluationFeb 28, 2023Jun 12, 2023Information, health management, and drug information display—2
    Food notesFeb 1, 2023Sep 12, 2023Health management4.14
    Sannuo HealthSep 20, 2019Nov 6, 2023Medical information, community/forum, drug information display, and medical device manufacturer—9
    Pick fruit healthMay 27, 2020Oct 13, 2023Food and beverage, equipment management, medical equipment, health products, and health management4.06
    Mint HealthApr 26, 2017Oct 13, 2023Catering information service and information inquiry4.67
    Peak Health ButlerOct 11, 2022Jul 13, 2023Health management and information inquiry4.25

    a(1) Health management: managing health through lifestyle changes; (2) medical information: information about diseases and health; (3) food and beverage: information about food nutrients; (4) health products: goods for maintaining or improving well-being; (5) drug information display: platform for medication details and usage guidance; (6) medical equipment sales platform: marketplace for health care equipment transactions; (7) educational information services: to provide information resources for health purposes; (8) medical information: information related to health care and treatments; (9) equipment management: access basic medical equipment data on the web; (10) catering information service: information hub for dining options and nutrition; (11) beauty service: offerings for cosmetic and aesthetic treatments; (12) web-based fitness: exercise and wellness programs accessible via the internet; (13) recipe drinks: formulations for beverages with health benefits; (14) community/forum: platform for discussions and interactions among users; (15) video customer service: support assistance provided through video communication; (16) health data statistics: analysis and presentation of health-related data; and (17) medical device manufacturer: producer of health care equipment.

    bNot applicable.

    WeChat Miniprogram for Nutrition Management

    Following registration and use, the functional evaluation mainly focused on the nutrition management module of the miniprogram. This module encompassed 4 primary functions (diet management, weight management, exercise management, and nutrition education through class, video, or popular science content) and 12 auxiliary functions (Table 2). These auxiliary functions encompassed specific features such as comparisons, analysis, and recommendations, along with capabilities for managing blood sugar, blood pressure, and sleep. Furthermore, it included features for nutrition assessment, questionnaire survey, dietitian consultation, access to a nutrition marketplace, generation of a nutrition report, monitoring of biochemical indicators, participation in nutrition-related social circles, and health assessment [19-21].

    Table 2. WeChat miniprogram for nutrition management.
    WeChat mini-program functionMiniprograms, n (%)
    Main function
    Food record/management/analysis/clock in23 (85.2)
    Exercise recording/management/analysis/clocking16 (59.3)
    Weight recording/management/analysis/clocking12 (44.4)
    Nutrition class/video/popular science19 (70.4)
    Auxiliary function
    Food list4 (14.8)
    Food comparison3 (11.1)
    Food inquiry/analysis8 (29.7)
    Food/recipe recommendations13 (48.1)
    Blood pressure/blood sugar/sleep management7 (25.9)
    Nutrition assessment/questionnaire8 (29.7)
    Nutrition expert consultation13 (48.1)
    Nutrition mall10 (37.0)
    Nutrition report7 (25.9)
    Biochemical index5 (18.5)
    Nutrition sharing/friend circle/community10 (37.0)
    Health assessment8 (29.6)

    As depicted in Table 2, the average functional score across all miniprograms was 6 points, ranging from 2 points in diet assessment to 10 points in peppermint nutrition food. Among the analyzed miniprograms, 85.2% (23/27) of them offered diet management features, facilitating the recording of daily dietary intake to assess nutritional status; 70.4% (19/27) of them provided nutrition knowledge and classroom teaching functionalities; 59.3% (16/27) of them offered exercise management capabilities, enabling users to record their daily physical activities; and only 44.4% (12/27) of them incorporated weight management functionalities.

    In the functional evaluation, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the 4 main functions of each miniprogram. Simultaneously, we scrutinized and evaluated the auxiliary features to ensure that users could access comprehensive nutrition management services. Through this comprehensive assessment, we aimed to furnish users with detailed feedback, assisting them in selecting a high-quality nutrition management miniprogram, which was tailored to their requirements. Furthermore, this endeavor aimed to enhance users’ health management practices and improve their overall and quality of life [22].

    uMARS Quality Rating

    An overview of the engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information scores for the top 5 and bottom 5 miniprograms was presented in Table 3. Among them, the highest-ranking miniprogram was the WeChat applet mint health, with a uMARS score of 3.88 (SD 0.73), followed by AI (artificial intelligence) dietary dietitian, chestnut food diary, peppermint nutritionist, and sannuo health in turn. Notably, the user score approached 4.6 and the functional scores were 7.0. In contrast, the lowest ranking was WeChat applet-nutritionist world, with a uMARS score of 2.85 (SD 1.09), followed by diet evaluation, peppermint nutrition pro, nutritional meal companion, and long light nutrition diet therapy. In addition, the participation, function, aesthetics, and information scores of miniprograms are summarized in Table 3.

    The uMARS total quality median score, calculated on a scale of 5, was 3.38 (IQR 3.14-3.57), with an overall range from 2.85 to 3.88, indicating that most miniprograms achieved scores above 3 points. The uMARS score of engagement ranged from 2.00 to 4.33, with a median score of 3.00 (IQR 2.67-3.67). The functional dimension varied from 3.00 to 4.00, and the median score was 3.33 (IQR 3.33-3.67), with a lower score of 2.67 and a higher score of 4.33 outside the reference range. The aesthetic dimension spanned from 2.33 to 4.67, with a median score of 3.67 (IQR 3.33-4.00), and the informational dimension ranged from 2.33 to 4.67, with a median score of 3.33 (IQR 2.67-3.67; Figure 2). Detailed uMARS scores for all 27 miniprograms are provided in Multimedia Appendix 1.

    Table 3. The 5 highest- and lowest-scoring miniprograms (N=27) based on the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS).
    WeChat appletEngagement score, mean (SD)Functionality score, mean (SD)Aesthetics score, mean (SD)Information score, mean (SD)uMARS score, mean (SD)
    Five highest-scoring miniprogramsa
    3.73 (0.96)3.83 (0.72)4.11 (0.33)3.92 (0.67)3.88 (0.73)
    3.73 (0.88)3.67 (0.49)4.33 (0.50)3.83 (0.58)3.85 (0.68)
    3.53 (0.92)3.67 (0.49)4.11 (0.60)4.08 (0.79)3.81 (0.76)
    3.47 (1.13)3.67 (0.49)4.00 (0.50)4.00 (0.60)3.75 (0.79)
    3.60 (1.12)3.67 (0.65)3.67 (0.50)4.00 (0.74)3.73 (0.82)
    Five lowest-scoring miniprogramsb
    2.80 (0.86)3.17 (0.58)3.44 (1.01)2.91 (0.79)3.04 (0.82)
    2.73 (1.03)3.08 (0.79)3.33 (0.50)3.17 (0.94)3.04 (0.87)
    2.93 (1.22)3.33 (0.49)3.11 (0.93)2.58 (1.24)2.98 (1.04)
    2.93 (1.16)3.33 (0.49)3.11 (1.05)2.50 (1.17)2.96 (1.03)
    2.53 (1.89)3.08 (0.90)3.22 (1.09)2.75 (1.14)2.85 (1.09)

    aFive highest-scoring miniprograms: (1) mint health, (2) AI (artificial intelligence) dietary dietitian, (3) chestnut food diary, (4) peppermint nutritionist, and (5) sannuo health.

    bFive lowest-scoring miniprograms: (1) long light nutrition diet therapy, (2) nutritional meal companion, (3) peppermint nutrition pro, (4) diet evaluation, and (5) nutritionist world.

    ‎
    Figure 2. The User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale overall and section-specific scores of the nutrition management miniprograms (N=27).

    Principal Findings

    A single user rating may not accurately gauge the quality of the miniprograms, and some existing evaluation systems for nutrition management miniprograms lack a scientifically grounded approach to promoting human nutrition. At present, the field of nutrition management miniprograms in China is still in its nascent stage and requires continual refinement of technique [18]. Analysis of functional scores revealed that only 18.5% of the miniprograms achieved scores above 8 points, indicating a need for improvement in their nutrition-related functionalities and health care. Among the identified issues, concerns were raised regarding the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the food database, potentially resulting in access to inaccurate nutrition. Furthermore, most miniprograms lack personalized services, consequently failing to offer tailored nutrition advice based on users’ specific requirements and health conditions [23].

    This study differs from prior research in several key aspects. First, many nutrition miniprograms now target specific disease types, tailoring diet management to the unique needs of patients. Second, some programs incorporate social circles to enhance user engagement, consequently fostering greater usage among patients [24]. Third, a subset of programs collaborates with the medical industry, engaging professional medical teams during development and establishing expert consultation platforms accessible via the WeChat miniprogram, tablet computer app, and computer software. Fourth, certain programs leverage data analysis and AI to deliver personalized nutrition advice and services, catering to individuals’ specific needs [25]. Fifth, the seamless integration of these programs within WeChat enables direct access without the need for installation or downloads, ensuring faster and more convenient processes. Finally, developers continuously refine and expand nutrition management programs in response to evolving technological advancements and user preferences, thus integrating new functionalities and enhancing user experience to elevate program quality and competitiveness [26]. Notably, our evaluation further revealed that the quality of nutrition management miniprograms varies significantly, with many exhibiting incomplete content, imperfect functionality, and limited individualization and intelligence [27].

    Limitations

    Although this study reports some interesting and significant findings, there are several limitations associated with the use of WeChat miniprograms. First, nutrition miniprograms on WeChat are still undeveloped and nascent compared to nutrition apps with high usage rates. Second, due to the inability to download WeChat miniprograms, relevant data such as download counts and software size cannot be fully obtained, limiting our analysis of the data displayed on the platform [28]. Additionally, our research focuses solely on analyzing the functionality and quality of miniprograms within the WeChat platform, resulting in a relatively narrow scope. Accordingly, future studies could expand their scope by conducting questionnaire surveys among users of the existing miniprograms or by integrating user feedback more effectively [29]. Simultaneously, encouraging active involvement from health professionals in the development of mobile health apps is crucial for ensuring their effectiveness and relevance in promoting better health outcomes [30]. Moving forward, the trajectory of development should prioritize the enhancement of quality, introduction of innovative features, and fostering of active participation of professionals, consequently providing more scientifically grounded and practical personalized dietary guidance and enriching research on domestic nutrition management miniprograms [31-33].

    Conclusions

    Our findings from the uMARS highlight a predominant emphasis on health aspects over nutritional specifications in the application of WeChat miniprograms related to nutrition management. The quality of these small programs is currently at an average level, with considerable room for functional improvements in the future.

    Acknowledgments

    This study is supported by the Jiangsu Social Science Fund in 2022: Research on the path and countermeasures of digital Technology to promote the construction of the Jiangsu Health Community (22GLB010).

    Authors' Contributions

    This paper is a collaborative effort of all authors. HS and YPW developed and designed the study. HS, JS, WZ, QX, and DDH conducted the search for the miniprograms, data analysis, and scale evaluation. HS and YPW drafted the manuscript, and all authors participated in the review and editing of the manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    uMARS (User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale) scale score.

    XLSX File, 20 KB
    1. Hua N, Zhang Y, Tan X, et al. Nutritional status and sarcopenia in nursing home residents: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Dec 18, 2022;19(24):17013. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Rus GE, Porter J, Brunton A, et al. Nutrition interventions implemented in hospital to lower risk of sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Nutr Diet. Feb 2020;77(1):90-102. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Seemer J, Kiesswetter E, Fleckenstein-Sußmann D, et al. Effects of an individualised nutritional intervention to tackle malnutrition in nursing homes: a pre-post study. Eur Geriatr Med. Jun 2022;13(3):741-752. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Lindner-Rabl S, Wagner V, Matijevic A, et al. Clinical interventions to improve nutritional care in older adults and patients in primary healthcare - a scoping review of current practices of health care practitioners. Clin Interv Aging. 2022;17:1-13. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Mikkelsen S, Geisler L, Holst M. Healthcare professionals’ experiences with practice for managing disease-related malnutrition in general practice and proposals for improvement: a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci. Sep 2022;36(3):717-729. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Ding Y, Lu X, Xie Z, Jiang T, Song C, Wang Z. Evaluation of a novel WeChat applet for image-based dietary assessment among pregnant women in China. Nutrients. Sep 10, 2021;13(9):3158. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Wu Y, Wang X, Gao F, Liao J, Zeng J, Fan L. Mobile nutrition and health management platform for perioperative recovery: an interdisciplinary research achievement using WeChat applet. Front Med (Lausanne). May 2023;10:1201866. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Huo J, Wu X, Gu C, et al. Using a WeChat mini-program-based lactation consultant intervention to increase the consumption of mother’s own milk by preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. Nov 24, 2021;22(1):834. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. LeBeau K, Huey LG, Hart M. Assessing the quality of mobile apps used by occupational therapists: evaluation using the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. May 1, 2019;7(5):e13019. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Li Y, Ding J, Wang Y, Tang C, Zhang P. Nutrition-related mobile apps in the China app store: assessment of functionality and quality. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Jul 30, 2019;7(7):e13261. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Adam A, Hellig JC, Perera M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. 'Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator' mobile applications (Apps): a systematic review and scoring using the validated user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). World J Urol. Apr 2018;36(4):565-573. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Fijačko N, Gosak L, Cilar L, et al. The effects of gamification and oral self-care on oral hygiene in children: systematic search in app stores and evaluation of apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Jul 8, 2020;8(7):e16365. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Shinohara Y, Yamamoto K, Ito M, et al. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the uMARS (user version of the mobile app rating system). Int J Med Inform. Sep 2022;165:104809. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Martin-Payo R, Carrasco-Santos S, Cuesta M, Stoyan S, Gonzalez-Mendez X, Fernandez-Alvarez MDM. Spanish adaptation and validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). J Am Med Inform Assoc. Nov 25, 2021;28(12):2681-2686. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Wilson H. Development and validation of the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Jun 10, 2016;4(2):e72. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Ko S, Lee J, An D, Woo H. Menstrual tracking mobile app review by consumers and health care providers: quality evaluations study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Mar 1, 2023;11:e40921. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Shetty VB, Soon WHK, Roberts AG, et al. A novel mobile health app to educate and empower young people with type 1 diabetes to exercise safely: prospective single-arm mixed methods pilot study. JMIR Diabetes. Oct 14, 2021;6(4):e29739. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Yu H, Tan L, Zhu T, Deng X. A WeChat applet-based national remote emergency system for malignant hyperthermia in China: a usability study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Sep 5, 2023;23(1):175. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Chen D, Shao J, Zhang H, et al. Development of an individualized WeChat mini program-based intervention to increase adherence to dietary recommendations applying the behaviour change wheel among individuals with metabolic syndrome. Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2267587. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Feng Y, Zhao Y, Mao L, et al. The effectiveness of an eHealth family-based intervention program in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the community via WeChat: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Mar 20, 2023;11:e40420. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Liu H, Feng J, Shi Z, et al. Effects of a novel applet-based personalized dietary intervention on dietary intakes: a randomized controlled trial in a real-world scenario. Nutrients. Feb 19, 2024;16(4):565. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Haas R, Aşan H, Doğan O, Michalek CR, Karaca Akkan Ö, Bulut ZA. Designing and implementing the MySusCof app-a mobile app to support food waste reduction. Foods. Jul 26, 2022;11(15):2222. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Tu W, Yan S, Yin T, et al. Mobile-based program improves healthy eating of ulcerative colitis patients: a pilot study. Dig Health. 2023;9:20552076231205741. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Lambrecht A, Vuillerme N, Raab C, et al. Quality of a supporting mobile app for rheumatic patients: patient-based assessment using the User Version of the Mobile Application Scale (uMARS). Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:715345. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Larson D, Henning J, Burgermaster M. Smartphone applications (apps) for nutrition education: a qualitative analysis of outpatient dietitian perspectives. J Nutr Educ Behav. Aug 2023;55(8):596-603. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Daniels K, Rathore FA, Bonnechère B. Mobile health: is your next rehabilitation’s specialist in your pocket? J Pak Med Assoc. Mar 2024;74(3):599-601. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Wang X, Zeng H, Li L, et al. Personalized nutrition intervention improves nutritional status and quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors in the community: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrition. 2022;103-104:111835. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Ding B, Gou B, Guan H, Wang J, Bi Y, Hong Z. WeChat-assisted dietary and exercise intervention for prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus in overweight/obese pregnant women: a two-arm randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. Sep 2021;304(3):609-618. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Lull C, von Ahnen JA, Gross G, et al. German mobile apps for patients with psoriasis: systematic search and evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. May 26, 2022;10(5):e34017. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Bardus M, Ali A, Demachkieh F, Hamadeh G. Assessing the quality of mobile phone apps for weight management: user-centered study with employees from a Lebanese university. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Jan 23, 2019;7(1):e9836. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Salas-Groves E, Galyean S, Alcorn M, Childress A. Behavior change effectiveness using nutrition apps in people with chronic diseases: scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Jan 13, 2023;11:e41235. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Schaafsma HN, Jantzi HA, Seabrook JA, et al. The impact of smartphone app-based interventions on adolescents’ dietary intake: a systematic review and evaluation of equity factor reporting in intervention studies. Nutr Rev. Mar 11, 2024;82(4):467-486. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Vietzke J, Schenk L, Baer NR. Middle-aged and older adults’ acceptance of mobile nutrition and fitness tools: a qualitative typology. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231163788. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AI: artificial intelligence
    MARS: Mobile Application Rating Scale
    uMARS: User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale

    Edited by Andre Kushniruk, Elizabeth Borycki; submitted 18.01.24; peer-reviewed by Ahmed Hassan, Belinda Lawford, Florence Carrouel; final revised version received 17.06.24; accepted 03.07.24; published 12.09.24.

    Copyright

    © Hui Sun, Yanping Wu, Jia Sun, Wu Zhou, Qian Xu, Dandan Hu. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 12.9.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.