Published on in Vol 6, No 4 (2019): Oct-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at, first published .
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (The FACTS Study Phase II) After Surgical Abortion: User-Centered Design

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (The FACTS Study Phase II) After Surgical Abortion: User-Centered Design

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (The FACTS Study Phase II) After Surgical Abortion: User-Centered Design

Original Paper

Women's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Corresponding Author:

Roopan Kaur Gill, MD, MPH

Women's Health Research Institute

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

University of British Columbia

4500 Oak Street

Vancouver, BC


Phone: 1 604 369 0774


Background: Human-centered design is a methodology that applies an iterative participatory process that engages the end-user for whom an innovation or intervention is designed for from start to end. There is general evidence to support the use of human-centered design for development of tools to affect health behavior, but specifically for family planning provision. This study is part two of a three-phase study that uses a user-centered design methodology which uses the findings from Phase I to design, develop, and test a digital health solution to support follow-up after an induced surgical abortion.

Objective: The objectives for this study were to: (1) develop a Web-based intervention based on preferences and experiences of women who underwent an abortion as measured in the formative phase of the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care Study; (2) conduct usability testing of the intervention to determine user-friendliness and appropriateness of the intervention; and (3) finalize a beta version of the Web-based intervention for pilot testing.

Methods: The study design was based on the “development-evaluation-implementation” process from the Medical Research Council Framework for Complex Medical Interventions. This study is in Phase II of III and is based on user-centered design methodology. Phase I findings demonstrated that women engage with technology to assist in clinical care and they preferred a comprehensive website with email or text notifications to support follow-up care. In Phase II we collaborated with family planning experts and key stakeholders to synthesize evidence from Phase I. With them and a development partner we built a prototype. Usability testing was completed with 9 participants using a validated System Usability Scale. This was then used to refine the intervention for Phase III pilot study. This study was approved by the local Ethics board.

Results: We developed a comprehensive Web-based tool called, which includes: Post-Procedure Care, Emotional Well-Being Tool, Contraception Explorer, Sexual Health, Book an Appointment, and Other Resources. Additionally, over the course of a month after the procedure, automatic email notifications were sent to women as a form of virtual follow-up support, directing them to resources. The Web-based tool was refined based on usability testing results.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that user-centered design is a useful methodology to build programs and interventions that are women-centered, specifically for abortion care.

JMIR Hum Factors 2019;6(4):e14558



Despite there being no legal restriction to abortion care in Canada, women who seek or have an abortion continue to experience stigma across the country. This has the potential to leave them feeling isolated and unsupported, and potentially prevents them from seeking follow-up care if needed. Therefore, innovative approaches for using information and communication technologies to achieve enhanced health service delivery, broadly known as digital health [1], is a way to address these issues. Digital health interventions in the form of hotlines, text messaging, and mobile applications have been shown to be safe, effective, and acceptable to women and providers for delivery of various aspects of abortion care [2-7]. Ensuring that an innovation is acceptable to the end-user and incorporating their voice throughout the research process is essential. Human-centered design is a methodology that implements an iterative participatory process by applying the needs of the end-users to the development of a given technology solution [8,9]. This methodology has been widely used for the design of innovations that generally affect behavior change.

Digital technology is changing the way we collect information and share and consume data. There is a growing momentum in the provision of resources for family planning, but specifically towards safe abortion care, in terms of the use of digital health interventions to address service delivery and legal barriers in various contexts. The importance of incorporating the end-user perspective’s voice into the design and development of these interventions is crucial, as it has been noted that there are few mobile interventions that are truly effective and scalable [4,9]. Utilizing user-centered design for the development of a mobile tool that women can use to self-manage their care after a surgical abortion will lead to a higher likelihood that it will be acceptable and feasible to use and implemented to scale.

This study is Phase II of III. The findings from Phase I, which are published separately, were essential to Phase II [10]. The main objectives for this study included: (1) the development of a Web-based intervention based on the preferences and experiences of women who underwent an abortion as measured in the formative phase of the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (FACTS) Study; (2) usability testing of the intervention to determine user-friendliness and appropriateness of the intervention; and (3) finalizing a beta-version of the Web-based intervention for pilot testing. Phase III of this three-phase study will determine acceptability and feasibility of the tool in a pilot prospective mixed-methods study. This study is the first in Canada to utilize user-centered design to develop a mobile intervention to support follow-up care after a surgical abortion.


The methods presented below are specific to the design, development, and usability testing of the intervention. A systematic visual depiction of each phase is provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Flow chart depiction of the three-phase study design.
View this figure

Development and Design

Employing user-centered design, a systematic process was used to develop a mobile intervention based on the results from Phase I. This was conducted from September 2017 to January 2018. User-centered design is a methodology with “roots in a participatory process” and:

provides a framework to understand and apply the needs of end-users to mHealth project development through a highly iterative process [9]

We collaborated with University of British Columbia family planning experts to synthesize evidence and create a storyboard. A storyboard process is used to build a short narrative to visually plot elements of a prototype [8]. This process is allocated 60 minutes per session and uses a series of comic book style frames for drawing and highlighting the narrative of the mobile intervention [8]. The number of sessions is dependent on the complexity of the intervention. This is a useful step in the ideation process of design and development, and design companies use this process as an important early stage of user-centered design for health innovations.

We engaged various stakeholders, using implementation science principles, with the intent to assess the context that the intervention would be potentially applied to. This included stakeholders such as end-users, the hospital administration, funders, health care providers, family planning experts, and donors. In addition, we further engaged key rural stakeholders from Northern Health Prince George Hospital. Specifically, a focus group session was held with four providers from Prince George Hospital. The presentation of results from Phase I and a storyboarding session with the providers highlighted the facilitators and barriers to the provision of safe abortion care in rural British Columbia, particularly regarding follow-up support. These results were used to further refine content and design of the intervention.

By October 2017, an initial prototype for a comprehensive Web-based solution was developed with the support of a development partner and the findings from Phase I [10]. A scope document included the required key features for design and content.

Theoretical Framework

Like Phase I, the study design for Phase II was informed by the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Reasoned Action [10-12]. Both these theories assess the perceived ease of use and usefulness of a system and individual’s conduct based on their lived experiences, attitudes, and intention to engage in a behavior. As highlighted in Phase I, the study instruments for all three phases were developed using these theories based on validated survey tools [10].

Usability Testing

Recruitment of usability testing participants initially included contacting women from a database created at one of the abortion clinics in Vancouver that had a list of those who had consented to participating in future research. Due to limited response rates, we proceeded to utilize a social media recruitment strategy through two provincial and national reproductive and sexual health advocacy organizations, Action for Sexual Health Canada and Options for Sexual Health. This included Twitter and Facebook notifications. Eligible participants contacted the research coordinator and received a link to the website, a password and username, and a link to a survey. We did not collect demographic data.

A validated questionnaire adapted from the 2010 Post Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) was used to assess participants’ qualitative and quantitative feedback on usefulness, ease of use, privacy and security, content, visual layout, and general concerns [13]. Participants were recruited from a database of women who had consented to be contacted for future research at the CARE Clinic at British Columbia (BC) Women’s Hospital. Participants were also recruited through social media advertising by national reproductive and sexual health organizations that used their respective Twitter accounts to share the link to the study website. Participants who were locally recruited conducted usability testing at BC Women’s Hospital with researchers present. For those recruited through social media, participants received a link to the survey by email and details about how to access the website. A team of key stakeholders made up of obstetrics and gynecology specialists, family doctors, counsellors, nurses, and administrators provided feedback about the initial prototype of the intervention. Participants provided feedback on usefulness, ease of use, privacy and security, content, visual layout, and general concerns.

Data Analysis

During Phase 2, we performed descriptive data analysis. Results of the PSSUQ survey were reported in percentage (%). An official score was not calculated as the survey was adapted from the PSSUQ but was not used in its entirety. The adapted survey can be found in Multimedia Appendix 1.

This study was approved by the Children’s and Women’s Research Ethics Board (H16-02823).


Phase II participants for the storyboarding process included key stakeholders from Vancouver and Prince George Hospital. The health care providers (HCPs) had a median of 12 years (range: 1-20 years) of experience in family planning. These HCPs included: physicians, counsellors, nurses, and administrators. The development company selected for the study was a local software development group. We conducted 5 storyboarding sessions, which included the following: (1) family planning specialists in Vancouver; (2) rural providers in Prince George Hospital that included one family doctor and three specialist obstetrician/gynecologists; (3) five counsellors from an urban clinic in Vancouver; (4) a participant who had previously had an abortion and volunteered to participate; (5) a session with the investigators of this study; and (6) three senior administrative staff involved with one urban abortion clinic. Each session lasted between 60 to 90 minutes.

Key Stakeholders Engagement

Based on our stakeholder analysis we developed a communication strategy for engaging them, including the development of a facts sheet about the study, a website explaining the study, and standard presentations. The first step was to meet with each stakeholder and provide an orientation to the concept of a postabortion support tool using mobile technology. This was also an opportunity to further discuss their level of involvement for development and implementation of the intervention. Ongoing updates were provided with in-person meetings, telephone calls, and email bulletins. Table 1 highlights the key stakeholder groups, their respective area of influence or interest, the project phase, the engagement method, and the frequency with which they engaged with the development of

Table 1. Key Stakeholder Engagement Matrix.
StakeholdersArea of influence or interestProject PhaseEngagement MethodFrequency
Health Care Practitioner

BCa Abortion Providers
(Vancouver and Prince George)
Content advisor
Adopter of intervention
Monthly Meetings
Story board participants

Family Planning Experts
Content advisorAllMeetingsBimonthly or
as needed

CounsellorsContent advisor
Patient behavior expert
Adopter of intervention
Phase I
Phase III
Luncheon presentations
Recruitment updates
Training sessions
Feedback opportunities

Children’s and Women’s Research Ethics Board
Family Planning Research Committee
Research administration
Project management
Provision of ethical standards
Provide research support
AllMeetings and Check-insWeekly
As needed
Consumer/End User

Individuals receiving care at 3 urban abortion clinics in Vancouver

Guide content for intervention and user design preferences

Phase I
Phase III
Provided honorariums
Over the phone interviews

Weekly during recruitment periods

Remote participants (Individuals who previously had an abortion procedure)Guide content for intervention and user design preferences

Phase IIProvided honorariums
Online and Face to Face engagement
Weekly during recruitment periods

Website/App DevelopersDevelop Resource
Creative Expertise
Phase II
Phase III
Face to Face & Online meetings
Technical Experts

PHSAf privacy and security
BCCHRIg web services
Ensured website security, safety of participants, and best practice at pilot sitePhase II
Phase III
As needed
Advocacy Groups

Options for Sexual Health
Action Canada for Sexual and Reproductive Rights
Assistance with Recruitment
Phase IIPresentations
Grand rounds
Decision Makers

Program Directors
Hospital CEOh and COOi
Facilitation of research
AllWritten communication
Meetings/ Presentations

Family Planning Fellowship
BC Women’s Hospital Foundation

Written communication
Meetings/ Presentations
Quarterly As needed

aBC: British Columbia.

bUBC: University of British Columbia.

cUCSF: University of California San Francisco.

dUCLA: University of California Los Angeles.

eWHRI: Women’s Health Research Institute.

fPHSA: Provincial Health Services Authority.

gBCCHRI: British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute.

hCEO: chief executive officer.

iCOO: chief operating officer.


The formative research findings from Phase I were used to inform the creation of storyboards in collaboration with the research team and family planning experts based at the University of British Columbia. Two storyboards were created: (1) design; and (2) content for the mobile intervention. These storyboards took into consideration information based on the preferences that were elicited from the findings in Phase I [10]. The storyboard was reviewed in an iterative manner by the family planning experts and research team. It was also shared with members of the administration and allied health care providers at the three abortion clinics where recruitment for Phase I was conducted.


Once the storyboard was completed, this was shared with a design and development company in Vancouver, British Columbia that is an expert in Web-based technologies for social marketing and behavior change and has experience working with the Ministry of Health in British Columbia. A step-by-step process was executed between the developer and the research team to build the prototype for the Web-based tool, which was a website that was accompanied by an email system. This came to be called The steps of the process are highlighted in Table 2. The components of are highlighted in Table 3.

Table 2. Scope tasks for development of mobile intervention.
Scope TasksDescription
Discovery Sessions
  • To discuss and uncover key aspects of website and email notifications to create comprehensive scope of work
Information Architecture
  • Development of wireframes
  • Create workflow document of user and administrative experiences
Content Review and Copyediting
  • Development of content by client for all pages
  • Developer to provide recommendations and feedback based on creating cohesive user experience
Design Development
  • Presentation of design proofs with 2 rounds of revisions
Technical Development
  • Use of PHPa-based content management system (ie, Wordpress) deployed to meet functional requirements
  • Content population with interactive elements
  • Review and revision
Web Analytics
  • Incorporate secure web analytics into website
Quality Assurance and User Acceptability Testing
  • Quality assurance and optimization for current versions of industry standard browsers
  • Ensure compatible on various mobile devices (ie, response website)
  • Address system errors and bugs
Deployment and Training
  • Deployment and hosting to third party company
  • Training of client to provide understanding of editing functionality provided in system

aPHP: hypertext preprocessor.

Table 3. Structure of
SectionsContent References
1. Postprocedure Care
  • Woman-centered postabortion care: Reference manual. [14]
  • British Columbia Women’s Hospital CAREa Clinic Postprocedure care resources
  • Everywoman’s Health Centre [15]
2. Contraceptive Explorer
  1. Interactive patient-centered screen
  2. Detailed information about each contraceptive method: effectiveness, cost, hormone free, prevent against STIb, access, side effects
  • CDCc/WHOd Medical Eligibility Criteria [16,17]
  • Bedsider [18]
  • Sex & U [19]
3. Emotional Well-Being Tool: How are you feeling today? Responses: Good, Ok, not so Good (Sources provided for specific emotions with definitions, strategies and resources)
  • Exhale Website [20]
  • Pregnancy Options [21]
  • Peace After Abortion [22]
  • All-Options [23]
  • Decision Assessment and Counseling in Abortion Care: Philosophy & Practice [24]
  • Everywoman’s Health Centre [15]
  • Expert consultation with counsellors from Everywoman’s Health Clinic, British Columbia Women’s CARE Clinic, Elizabeth Bagshaw Clinic, and University of San Francisco
4. Sexual Health
  1. Menstrual Cycle Interactive Tool
  2. Menstrual Cycle Trackers
  3. Sexual Health Resources
  • Interactive tool content adapted from Williams Gynecology 2nd Edition [25]
5. Book a Counsellor
  • Not applicable
6. Myths and Facts Interactive Quiz
  • Willow Clinic [26]
7. Five circulating Articles
  1. Meditation 101
  2. Advice for Partners
  3. How to talk to Family and Friends
  4. FAQe
  • Meditation developed in partnership with Moment Meditation, local Vancouver meditation centre
  • Everywoman’s Health Centre
  • British Columbia Women’s Hospital CARE Clinic Resource Sheet
  • Content developed in collaboration with counsellors at British Columbia Women’s Hospital CARE clinic and Everywoman’s Health Centre
About Us
  • Not applicable

aCARE: Abortion Clinic (CARE program).

bSTI: sexually transmitted infection.

cCDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

dWHO: World Health Organization.

eFAQ: frequently asked questions.

Usability Testing

As stated in the methods, user testing occurred both in person and remotely. Participants were given access to the website and after reviewing it completed an adapted version of the PSSUQ 2010 and provided qualitative feedback. There were 7 remote participants and 2 in-person participants.

The survey results adapted from the PSSUQ 2010 are available in Multimedia Appendix 2. Participants were satisfied with the usability of Specifically, 62.36% “Strongly Agreed” and 28.69% “Somewhat Agreed” with the overall usability of the website. The PSSUQ reflects the overall usability of a website or app based on the respondent’s experience. It has 3 subscores derived from subsets of 16 questions. Overall usability defined by the PSSUQ reflects system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Table 4 highlights the comments that participants shared and that were noted in the revisions of the prototype to prepare for the Phase III pilot study. Like Phase I, participants were accustomed to using some form of technology and were supportive of a Web-based tool to support follow-up care after an abortion. This was elicited from the key findings from potential users who completed the usability testing.

Table 4. Key findings from potential users on the acceptability and perceptions of Web-based sexual health services/testing and how these influenced the design of
Emotional Wellbeing Tool
  • Navigation through the emotional well-being tool was found to be cumbersome, with too many clicks, and difficult navigation back to the most recently page viewed
  • Having accessible drop boxes rather than having to scroll up and down would be helpful
  • Change wording of the term emotional tool–is the tool emotional?
  • Have new articles that would be posted semiregularly, consider having guest articles
  • Consider reordering the recommendations for each emotion as the logic would be different based on whether one is feeling isolated versus relieved
  • Basic and repetitive suggestions on emotional tool
Website Branding or Contact Us section
  • More clarity on what is and what it does, provide more information about the FACTSa team, missions and values, acknowledgements and the funders
  • Reorganize the other resources page and consider organizing according to issue, community, etc
  • Contact us was buried in the about us section; would be helpful to separate this
Postprocedure Care
  • Reorganize content so “what to expect” and emergency information comes later, or have it as another column next to “precautions”, “pregnancy and periods” to compare/contrast what is to be expected versus what is ERb worthy
  • Consider adding the emotion “Fear” in the emotional well-being tool as this was the feeling I experienced after having my abortion. For instance, feelings that I may bleed out or get an infection.
  • Add more supportive and reassuring content on the landing page, for example comment that abortion is safe, there are supports available to you and you are not alone
Sexual Health Section
  • Ensure that the links are all working
  • Formatting of the hyperlinks for the menstrual cycle tools and other resources
Contact a Counsellor
  • Add “Book a Counsellor” to the side bar so that it is more prominent and easier to find
  • Add the helpline information at the bottom of each page so that it is accessible to the user
  • On the sexual health cost page, the lowest cost options are also the least effective, but on the page, they’re presented the same. It reads like a low-cost recommendation for contraception. I wonder if there\'s some way to display that it\'s low cost but not effective. For lower income women, seeing this might reinforce cheaper methods and discourage more effective methods. For more expensive methods of contraception, information on any available supports would be helpful. Some health plans cover IUDsc and birth control, for example. Do any clinics or orgs help cover the cost of the pill or IUDs?
  • Overall comparison page would have been useful
  • Need a more clearly stated privacy statement
  • Not sure if a sign in and registration is required of the website; might be useful to have this accessible to all comers
  • This site is for women who have had surgical abortions, but it would be useful to include medical abortion to this as well
  • Something that really dictates whether I am a fan of a resource or not is inclusivity. At this point, FACTS seems very heteronormative and cis-centric.
  • It would be nice to see a section dedicated to resources for loved ones, parallel set of “post procedure care” and “emotional well-being sections” for people’s support systems so that they can be informed and feel competent in supporting their loved ones who have undergone an abortion
General Design
  • Simple layout was easy on the eyes, simple language and openness of tone
  • User friendly, and it covered things I wish I had known after my procedure
  • Made me feel like I am part of a community of people
  • Not overwhelming to use
  • Have featured content visible on other pages aside from home page
  • Easy but there were too many clicks needed to navigate through, making it difficult to navigate
  • More explanation about who has an abortion, what is normal
  • Emotional tool was great, easy to navigate and tips were targeted and useful

aFACTS: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care.

bER: emergency room.

cIUD: intrauterine device.

The email notification system was developed in collaboration with family planning experts, physicians, and counsellors. Their expertise was used to specify what type of messaging would be appropriate at which time interval. This was complimented with results from Phase I of timing and content of email or text messaging. Two email streams were developed: one for participants who had an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted and another for those who did not have an IUD inserted. The emails were sent starting on the day of procedure (day 0) followed by every other day for one week and then weekly until day 28. The first week was focused on post-procedure signs and symptoms, and the next three weeks alternated between contraception counselling, emotional support, and overall sexual health information. The design of the email notifications was aligned with the design of The content was developed by the primary investigator and reviewed by counsellors at the abortion clinics. The messaging was repurposed based on the social marketing expertise of our developer.

Primary Findings is the first comprehensive Web-based postabortion tool in Canada and has the potential to be integrated as part of family planning services. It includes four interactive tools (Emotional Support Tool, Contraceptive Explorer, Postprocedure Care, and Sexual Health) that integrate automatic email notifications to provide support over the course of one month after the procedure. Integration of into clinical practice provides an opportunity to consider a new approach to supplement follow-up care specifically for abortions, but also women’s health in general. We utilized user-centered design methodology, an iterative development process that was informed by input from key stakeholders such as patients, family planning experts, and administrators who are involved with abortion care [27-29]. This was crucial in developing a tool that responded to findings from Phase I [10].

Specifically, this phase demonstrated the importance of including the end users and key stakeholders in the design, development, and testing of a mobile intervention that services a population and deals with a health care issue that continues to be stigmatized. The formative research indicated essential information regarding women’s interactions with technology, their needs and desires around follow-up and access to information, and their feedback on design, which was essential in the success of An iterative design process was important to ensure that the research team was continually evaluating that realized the needs of the target users. Similar studies have successfully demonstrated that using this approach leads to a higher likelihood of implementation and scalability [3,27-29].

We adopted a few theoretical frameworks, all of which use a comprehensive participatory approach to developing eHealth technologies. This was similarly done by Gilbert et al in the development of Get Checked Online, which is a Web-based sexually transmitted infection testing resource [29]. More specifically, integrating the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Reasoned action with the user-centered design methodology let us use a holistic approach to develop According to the Technology Acceptance Model, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of a system are the two predominant indicators of system adoption [11,30]. Participants in our study were accustomed to using some form of technology, either mobile phones or computers, did not require acquisition of new skills, and were keen on the development of a technology-based tool to support follow-up care after an abortion. Importantly, will not eliminate structural barriers to comprehensive abortion care, and though it may not directly affect health behavior and decision-making, it may assist with making the delivery of abortion care more efficient, convenient, patient-centered, and accessible.

The limitations for this study include overall generalizability to other populations, small sample size for usability testing, loss to follow up, and recruitment bias. As it pertains to recruitment bias, those who consented to participate were likely individuals who were more engaged with technology, of a higher socioeconomic demographic, and were more likely to be early adopters of a digital health intervention to support abortion care. Though demographic data was not specifically collected for Phase II, this is based on the demographic data collected in Phase I [10]. In previous studies this has been noted as a digital divide, which suggests that though many developers of technology-based health interventions are optimistic about their impact, this needs to be balanced by the fact that the pattern of adoption is along social gradients [29]. New technologies like may further reinforce these social divides. Furthermore, abortion continues to be a stigmatized issue, which can be limiting for research since it can be a sensitive topic for most. In our study, it posed difficulties with recruitment and loss to follow-up. We assumed that lack of participant engagement may be associated with stigma about abortion, so we had to reevaluate our usability testing strategy regarding using social media platforms, which proved to be more successful as more participants were willing to engage anonymously at a distance. This recruitment strategy for abortion-specific studies is promising, particularly when thinking about diversifying the participants recruited and obtaining robust response rates for analysis.

Balancing these limitations are the strengths of this study, including: successful development of user-centered design elements, wide stakeholder engagement, diverse expertise on the research team, rigorous research methodologies, iterative design process, and development of the first Web-based postabortion tool in Canada, with the potential to expand it to other aspects of women’s health (eg, miscarriage, gynecologic cancer care, sexual pleasure, and well-being).

Further research to evaluate acceptability and feasibility of and overall patient experience will be assessed in a prospective pilot mixed-methods study, which is Phase III of this three-phase study. In addition, as suggested in other Web-based literature [29], a health equity impact assessment with expert consultation and literature review may also help identify ways in which reinforces or alleviates health inequities in sexual health services.


By using user-centered design and rigorous key stakeholder engagement, there is potential for digital solutions for women’s health to be implemented at scale. This study demonstrated that, by engaging end-users throughout the design of an intervention targeted to them, this provides insights and nuances that have implications for usability, acceptability, and feasibility to integration as a part of clinical care.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Pictorial representation of FACTS (Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care) three phase study design.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 62 KB

Multimedia Appendix 2

Adapted survey results for usability testing using PSSUQ 2010 overall satisfaction scores reflecting system usefulness, information quality and interface quality. PSSUQ: Post Study System Usability Questionnaire.

PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 71 KB

  1. World Health Organization. 2019. WHO Guideline: Recommendations on digital interventions on health system strengthening   URL: [accessed 2019-09-21]
  2. Gerdts C, Hudaya I. Quality of Care in a Safe-Abortion Hotline in Indonesia: Beyond Harm Reduction. Am J Public Health 2016 Nov;106(11):2071-2075. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Smith C, Vannak U, Sokhey L, Ngo TD, Gold J, Free C. Mobile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF): the development of a mobile phone-based (mHealth) intervention to support post-abortion family planning (PAFP) in Cambodia. Reprod Health 2016 Jan 05;13:1 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Smith C, Gold J, Ngo TD, Sumpter C, Free C. Mobile phone-based interventions for improving contraception use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 Jun 26(6):CD011159 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Bracken H, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Morroni C, Winikoff B. RU OK? The acceptability and feasibility of remote technologies for follow-up after early medical abortion. Contraception 2014 Jul;90(1):29-35. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. LaRoche KJ, Foster AM. Toll free but not judgment free: evaluating postabortion support services in Ontario. Contraception 2015 Nov;92(5):469-474. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Grindlay K, Lane K, Grossman D. Women's and providers' experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study. Womens Health Issues 2013;23(2):e117-e122. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Design Kit. Storyboard   URL: [accessed 2017-10-20] [WebCite Cache]
  9. Eckman M, Gorski I, Mehta K. Leveraging design thinking to build sustainable mobile health systems. J Med Eng Technol 2016;40(7-8):422-430. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Gill R, Ogilvie G, Norman WV, Fitzsimmons B, Maher C, Renner R. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I. J Med Internet Res 2019 May 29;21(5):e13387 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Holden RJ, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010 Feb;43(1):159-172 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 1989 Aug;35(8):982-1003. [CrossRef]
  13. Fruling A, Lee S. Assessing the Reliability, Validity and Adaptability of PSSUQ. 2005 Aug Presented at: Proceedings of 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems; 2005; Omaha Nebraska   URL:
  14. Hyman AG, Castleman L. Woman-Centered Abortion Care: Reference Manual. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Ipas; 2004.   URL: [accessed 2019-09-22]
  15. Everywoman's Health Centre. 2019. After an aspiration (surgical) abortion   URL: [accessed 2019-09-22]
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018 Nov 02. US Medical Eligibility Criteria (US MEC) for Contraceptive Use, 2016   URL: [accessed 2019-09-22]
  17. World Health Organization. 2015. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use: Fifth edition - Executive Summary   URL: [accessed 2019-09-22]
  18. Bedsider. Birth Control Support Network   URL: [accessed 2017-09-22]
  19. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. 2019. Sex & U   URL: [accessed 2019-09-22]
  20. Exhale. 2019. After-abortion talkline   URL: [accessed 2017-09-22]
  21. Pregnancy Options.   URL: [accessed 2019-09-22]
  22. Torre-Bueno A. Peace after Abortion: a self-help book for women & men.   URL: [accessed 2017-09-22]
  23. All-Options. 2019. Toll-free Talkline   URL: [accessed 2017-09-01]
  24. Perucci AC. Decision Assessment and Counseling in Abortion Care: Philosophy and Practice. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc; 2012.
  25. Hoffman B, Schorge J, Schaffer J, Halvorson L, Bradshaw K, Cunningham F. Williams Gynecology, Second Edition. New York City, New York: Mcgraw-hill Education/Medical; 2012.
  26. Willow Women's Clinic. 2010. Myths and Facts about Abortion   URL: [accessed 2017-09-01]
  27. Gilbert M, Salway T, Haag D, Fairley CK, Wong J, Grennan T, et al. Use of GetCheckedOnline, a Comprehensive Web-based Testing Service for Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections. J Med Internet Res 2017 Mar 20;19(3):e81 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Dehlendorf C, Fitzpatrick J, Steinauer J, Swiader L, Grumbach K, Hall C, et al. Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Patient Educ Couns 2017 Jul;100(7):1374-1381 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Gilbert M, Haag D, Hottes TS, Bondyra M, Elliot E, Chabot C, et al. Get Checked… Where? The Development of a Comprehensive, Integrated Internet-Based Testing Program for Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections in British Columbia, Canada. JMIR Res Protoc 2016 Sep 20;5(3):e186 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KR. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. CAIS 2003;12. [CrossRef]

BC: British Columbia
FACTS: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care
HCP: health care provider
IUD: intrauterine device
PSSUQ: Post Study System Usability Questionnaire

Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 01.05.19; peer-reviewed by J Mitchell, Y Zhou, S Kakarmath, GE Iyawa, L Albrecht; comments to author 18.06.19; revised version received 13.08.19; accepted 30.08.19; published 10.10.19


©Roopan Kaur Kaur Gill, Gina Ogilvie, Wendy V Norman, Brian Fitzsimmons, Ciana Maher, Regina Renner. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (, 10.10.2019.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.