This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

User-centred Design Case Studies (602) mHealth for Health Administration (150) Postoperative Monitoring and Telemonitoring (128)

Published on in Vol 6, No 4 (2019): Oct-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/14558, first published .
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (The FACTS Study Phase II) After Surgical Abortion: User-Centered Design

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (The FACTS Study Phase II) After Surgical Abortion: User-Centered Design

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (The FACTS Study Phase II) After Surgical Abortion: User-Centered Design

Authors of this article:

Roopan Kaur Gill1 Author Orcid Image ;   Gina Ogilvie1 Author Orcid Image ;   Wendy V Norman1 Author Orcid Image ;   Brian Fitzsimmons1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ciana Maher1 Author Orcid Image ;   Regina Renner1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Tong C, Luo Y, Li T. Factors Associated with the Choice of Contraceptive Method following an Induced Abortion after Receiving PFPS Counseling among Women Aged 20–49 Years in Hunan Province, China. Healthcare 2023;11(4):535 View
  2. Salma I, Waelli M. A framework for the implementation of certification procedures in nurse level: a mixed approach study. BMC Health Services Research 2021;21(1) View
  3. Göttgens I, Oertelt-Prigione S. The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(12):e28102 View
  4. Shuldiner J, Shah N, Reis C, Chalmers I, Ivers N, Nathan P. Developing a Provincial Surveillance and Support System for Childhood Cancer Survivors: Multiphase User-Centered Design Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(3):e37606 View
  5. Stifani B, Peters M, French K, Gill R, Ayatollahi H. There’s an App for it: A systematic review of mobile apps providing information about abortion using a revised MARS scale. PLOS Digital Health 2023;2(7):e0000277 View
  6. Luigi-Bravo G, Maria Ramirez A, Gerdts C, Gill R. Lessons learned from developing and implementing digital health tools for self-managed abortion and sexual and reproductive healthcare in Canada, the United States, and Venezuela. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 2023;31(4) View
  7. Gill R, Ogilvie G, Norman W, Fitzsimmons B, Maher C, Renner R. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care After Surgical Abortion (the FACTS Study Phase 3): Mixed Methods Prospective Pilot Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e46284 View
  8. Zolfaqari Z, Ayatollahi H, Ranjbar F, Abasi A. Motivating and inhibiting factors influencing the application of mhealth technology in post-abortion care: a review study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2024;24(1) View
  9. Cleverley K, Sergeant A, Zamberlin N, Medina S, Tam G, Gill R. Aya Contigo: evaluation of a digital intervention to support self-managed medication abortion in Venezuela. Frontiers in Global Women's Health 2024;5 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Akanbi K, Lekwa S, Prabhakar A. Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2024, Volume 4. View