This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Design and Usability of Consumer Health Tech and Home Monitoring Devices (189) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2746) Anxiety and Stress Disorders (1006) Wearable Devices and Sensors (822) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (915) Occupational Health and Ergonomics/Prevention at the Workplace (220) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2771) Methods in Human Factors Research (38) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (542)

Published on in Vol 9, No 3 (2022): Jul-Sep

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/33754, first published .
Alignment Between Heart Rate Variability From Fitness Trackers and Perceived Stress: Perspectives From a Large-Scale In Situ Longitudinal Study of Information Workers

Alignment Between Heart Rate Variability From Fitness Trackers and Perceived Stress: Perspectives From a Large-Scale In Situ Longitudinal Study of Information Workers

Alignment Between Heart Rate Variability From Fitness Trackers and Perceived Stress: Perspectives From a Large-Scale In Situ Longitudinal Study of Information Workers

Authors of this article:

Gonzalo J Martinez1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ted Grover2 Author Orcid Image ;   Stephen M Mattingly1 Author Orcid Image ;   Gloria Mark2 Author Orcid Image ;   Sidney D’Mello3 Author Orcid Image ;   Talayeh Aledavood4 Author Orcid Image ;   Fatema Akbar2 Author Orcid Image ;   Pablo Robles-Granda5 Author Orcid Image ;   Aaron Striegel1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (16) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Gonzalo J Martinez   1 , PhD ;   Ted Grover   2 , PhD ;   Stephen M Mattingly   1 , PhD ;   Gloria Mark   2 , PhD ;   Sidney D’Mello   3 , PhD ;   Talayeh Aledavood   4 , PhD ;   Fatema Akbar   2 , PhD ;   Pablo Robles-Granda   5 , PhD ;   Aaron Striegel   1 , PhD

1 Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States

2 Informatics Department, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States

3 Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States

4 Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland

5 Thomas M Siebel Center for Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States

Corresponding Author: