Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Design and Usability of Clinical Software and EHRs (465) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (943) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (1305) Electronic Health Records (1734) Information System Evaluation and Best Practices (54)

Published on in Vol 12 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/51495, first published .
Diverse medical team of four doctors in scrubs and lab coats

Comparisons of Physicians’, Nurses’, and Social Welfare Professionals’ Experiences With Participation in Information System Development: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Comparisons of Physicians’, Nurses’, and Social Welfare Professionals’ Experiences With Participation in Information System Development: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Authors of this article:

Susanna Martikainen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Johanna Viitanen2 Author Orcid Image ;   Samuel Salovaara3 Author Orcid Image ;   Ulla-Mari Kinnunen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Tinja Lääveri2, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Nissinen S, Toivio P, Sormunen E. Digital work tools in occupational health care: A cross-sectional survey of usability and usefulness among occupational health professionals in Finland. DIGITAL HEALTH 2026;12 View
  2. Hübner U, Egbert N, Saranto K, Chang P, Rotegård A, Madsen I, González Z, Ammenwerth E, Bichel-Findlay J, Ball M. Revising the TIGER 2018 Health Informatics Competency Framework: Updated Core Competency Areas for Nurses in a Digital Health Era. Methods of Information in Medicine 2026 View