e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 6 of 6 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 4 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
A heuristic evaluation serves to systematically review the current state of a product, identifying usability and experience issues [36,37]. This evaluation is conducted based on Jakob Nielsen’s 10 usability heuristics, which are high-level guidelines grounded in an understanding of human behavior, psychology, and information processing.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e52496
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For instance, a heuristic prompt might use the rule that an abbreviation is typically capitalized, followed by a period, and preceded by an article or a noun. This approach contrasts with chain of thought prompts, which focus on elucidating the reasoning or logic behind an output. Instead, heuristic prompts leverage a series of predefined rules to direct the LLM in executing a specific task.
Mathematically, we can express a heuristic prompt as H(x), a function applied to an input sequence x.
JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e55318
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The heuristic evaluation was conducted, assuming that Daily Healthcare 2.0 was implemented. Focusing on the app’s core functions, a link to a 3-minute and 17-second video recording app screen was distributed, and the experts evaluated the app after watching the video guide. Experts who had already been recruited and voluntarily expressed their willingness to participate were sent an email containing links to a video guide and web-based survey.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e50029
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Design Validation of a Relational Agent by COVID-19 Patients: Mixed Methods Study
heuristic
JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e42740
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Evaluating the Usability of an Emergency Department After Visit Summary: Staged Heuristic Evaluation
Heuristic evaluations are commonly used to evaluate the usability of health technologies [1,2]. Relying on human factors or usability experts to assess a technology against usability criteria (ie, heuristics), heuristic evaluations offer an efficient and low-cost alternative to user-based evaluation methods [3]. However, the method’s reliance on human factors expertise may limit its applicability and usefulness, especially regarding the evaluation of the severity of identified usability violations.
JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e43729
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Assessing the Usability of a Clinical Decision Support System: Heuristic Evaluation
The heuristic evaluation proposed by Nielsen is an assessment conducted by a small group of evaluators using an evidence-based set of design guidelines called heuristics [38,42]. Heuristic evaluators, who are generally experts in HCI, examine a user interface and the system design according to the evidence-based interface standards.
JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(2):e31758
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS