This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Design, Usability, and Evaluation of Research Instruments, Scales, and Measures (85) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (2088) Information Seeking, Information Needs (561) Supporting Informal Care and Caregivers (381)

Published on in Vol 7, No 3 (2020): Jul-Sep

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18120, first published .
Integration of Conversion Factors for the Development of an Inclusive eHealth Tool With Caregivers of Functionally Dependent Older Persons: Social Justice Design

Integration of Conversion Factors for the Development of an Inclusive eHealth Tool With Caregivers of Functionally Dependent Older Persons: Social Justice Design

Integration of Conversion Factors for the Development of an Inclusive eHealth Tool With Caregivers of Functionally Dependent Older Persons: Social Justice Design

Authors of this article:

Karine Latulippe1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Christine Hamel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Dominique Giroux1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Latulippe K, Hamel C, Giroux D. Co-Design to Support the Development of Inclusive eHealth Tools for Caregivers of Functionally Dependent Older Persons: Social Justice Design. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(11):e18399 View
  2. Ozkaynak M, Sircar C, Frye O, Valdez R. A Systematic Review of Design Workshops for Health Information Technologies. Informatics 2021;8(2):34 View
  3. Palumbo R, Nicola C, Adinolfi P. Addressing health literacy in the digital domain: insights from a literature review. Kybernetes 2022;51(13):82 View
  4. Merchán-Baeza J, Borralleras Andreu C, Minobes-Molina E, Grau Carrión S, Romero-Mas M, Ramon-Aribau A. Co-created Technological Solutions for Caregivers in Health Care: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41260 View
  5. Nielsen A. Universal design for people with psychosocial disabilities – The effect of COVID-19. Research in Transportation Economics 2023;98:101280 View
  6. van Leersum C, Jaschinski C, Bults M, van der Zwart J. Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems 2024;22(1) View
  7. Nielsen A. The role of toilets in public spaces: An interview study with individuals experiencing gastrointestinal issues. Social Science & Medicine 2024;362:117408 View
  8. Iqbal S, Ahmed F, Uddin I, Gilchrist K, Juan N, Motta A, Fatima Q, Arshad S, Vindrola‐Padros C. The Implementation of Community Engagement Models Amongst People With Learning Disabilities in the Context of Health and Social Care: A Systematic Review. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 2025;53(4):540 View
  9. Hamilton F, Imran S, Mahmood A, Dobbin J, Bradbury K, Poduval S, Scuffell J, Thomas F, Stevenson F. Design and deployment of digital health interventions to reduce the risk of the digital divide and to inform development of the living with COVID recovery: a systematic scoping review. Health and Social Care Delivery Research 2025:1 View