This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Health Risk and Perception in Cognitive Reasoning (17) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (851) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1407) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (773) Visualization in eHealth (58) Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (679) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (479) Decision Support for Health Professionals (1185) Clinical Informatics (1022) Design and Usability of Clinical Software and EHRs (268)

Published on in Vol 9, No 2 (2022): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/29118, first published .
Effective Communication of Personalized Risks and Patient Preferences During Surgical Informed Consent Using Data Visualization: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Patients After Surgery

Effective Communication of Personalized Risks and Patient Preferences During Surgical Informed Consent Using Data Visualization: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Patients After Surgery

Effective Communication of Personalized Risks and Patient Preferences During Surgical Informed Consent Using Data Visualization: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Patients After Surgery

Authors of this article:

Undina Gisladottir1 Author Orcid Image ;   Drashko Nakikj1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rashi Jhunjhunwala2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jasmine Panton2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Gabriel Brat1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Nils Gehlenborg1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (7) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Adams A, Reames B, Krell R. Morbidity and Mortality of Non-pancreatectomy operations for pancreatic cancer: An ACS-NSQIP analysis. The American Journal of Surgery 2023;225(2):315 View
  2. Lukashova-Sanz O, Dechant M, Wahl S. The Influence of Disclosing the AI Potential Error to the User on the Efficiency of User–AI Collaboration. Applied Sciences 2023;13(6):3572 View
  3. Wood M, West N, Fokkens C, Chen Y, Loftsgard K, Cardinal K, Whyte S, Portales-Casamar E, Görges M. An Individualized Postoperative Pain Risk Communication Tool for Use in Pediatric Surgery: Co-Design and Usability Evaluation. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2023;6:e46785 View
  4. Panton J, Beaulieu-Jones B, Marwaha J, Woods A, Nakikj D, Gehlenborg N, Brat G. How surgeons use risk calculators and non-clinical factors for informed consent and shared decision making: A qualitative study. The American Journal of Surgery 2023;226(5):660 View
  5. Teixeira M, Castro E, Medeiros N, Pina P, Alves S, Oliveira P. Bedside preoperative predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure in microlaryngeal surgery. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2024;281(5):2539 View
  6. Lim B, Seth I, Cuomo R, Kenney P, Ross R, Sofiadellis F, Pentangelo P, Ceccaroni A, Alfano C, Rozen W. Can AI Answer My Questions? Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Assessment for Abdominoplasty Patients. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2024 View
  7. Cohen S, Baimas-George M, Ponce C, Chen N, Bain P, Ganske I, Katz J, Luks F, Kent T. Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? A Scoping Review of the Impact of Visual Aids on Patients Undergoing Surgery. Journal of Surgical Education 2024;81(9):1276 View