This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Design and Usability of Clinical Software and EHRs (348) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (1005) Registered Report (791) Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Sciences (202) Shared Decision Making and Self-Advocacy (58) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1915) Quality Improvement (294) Clinical Informatics (1325) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (698) Postoperative Monitoring and Telemonitoring (190)

Published on in Vol 11 (2024)

This is a member publication of University of Bristol (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/46698, first published .
Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Christin Hoffmann1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kerry Avery1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rhiannon Macefield1 Author Orcid Image ;   Tadeáš Dvořák1 Author Orcid Image ;   Val Snelgrove2 ;   Jane Blazeby1 Author Orcid Image ;   Della Hopkins3 Author Orcid Image ;   Shireen Hickey4 Author Orcid Image ;   Ben Gibbison1, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Leila Rooshenas1 Author Orcid Image ;   Adam Williams3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jonathan Aning3 Author Orcid Image ;   Hilary L Bekker6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Angus GK McNair1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   The ALPACA Study Team3
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (13) Metrics

Journals

  1. Toft B, Ellegaard T, Nielsen B, Rossen C, Hørlück J, Ludvigsen M, Bekker H, Rodkjær L. Health service provider views on measuring patient involvement in healthcare: an interview study with researchers, clinicians, service managers, and policymakers. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View
  2. Chang S, Chen D, Chen C, Zhou D, Yeh L. Device Failures and Adverse Events Associated With Rhinolaryngoscopes: Analysis of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database. JMIR Human Factors 2025;12:e67036 View
  3. Hoffmann C, Avery K, Macefield R, Snelgrove V, Rooshenas L, Bekker H, Hopkins D, Cabral C, Blazeby J, Gibbison B, Hickey S, Williams A, Aning J, Judge A, Smith A, Lingampalli A, Reeves B, Preshaw J, Whitehouse M, Cresswell P, Braude P, Potter S, Beckitt T, Whittlestone T, McNair A. Patient and surgeon perspectives of a large-scale system for automated, real-time monitoring and feedback of shared decision-making integrated into surgical practice: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2025;15(6):e099090 View