This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Design and Usability of Clinical Software and EHRs (268) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (787) Registered Report (560) Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Sciences (144) Shared Decision Making and Self-Advocacy (20) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1407) Quality Improvement (253) Clinical Informatics (1022) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (573) Postoperative Monitoring and Telemonitoring (123)

Published on in Vol 11 (2024)

This is a member publication of University of Bristol (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/46698, first published .
Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Christin Hoffmann1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kerry Avery1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rhiannon Macefield1 Author Orcid Image ;   Tadeáš Dvořák1 Author Orcid Image ;   Val Snelgrove2 ;   Jane Blazeby1 Author Orcid Image ;   Della Hopkins3 Author Orcid Image ;   Shireen Hickey4 Author Orcid Image ;   Ben Gibbison1, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Leila Rooshenas1 Author Orcid Image ;   Adam Williams3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jonathan Aning3 Author Orcid Image ;   Hilary L Bekker6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Angus GK McNair1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   The ALPACA Study Team3
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (15) Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.