This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Design, Usability, and Evaluation of Research Instruments, Scales, and Measures (56) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (589) Evaluation and Research Methodology for mHealth (210) Psychological, -behavioural, -social, and/or -cultural Experiments and Interventions (53)

Published on in Vol 5, No 4 (2018): Oct-Dec

The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version

The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version

The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version

Authors of this article:

Astrid Torbjørnsen1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Milada C Småstuen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Anne Karen Jenum2 Author Orcid Image ;   Eirik Årsand3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Lis Ribu1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (18) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Hyppönen H, Kaipio J, Heponiemi T, Lääveri T, Aalto A, Vänskä J, Elovainio M. Developing the National Usability-Focused Health Information System Scale for Physicians: Validation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(5):e12875 View
  2. Sahu P, Mathur A, Ganesh A, Nair S, Chand P, Murthy P. Acceptance of e-consult for Substance Use Disorders during the COVID 19 pandemic: A study from India. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 2020;54:102451 View
  3. Zimmerman B, Seidman D, Berger N, Cascetta K, Nezolosky M, Trlica K, Ryncarz A, Keeton C, Moshier E, Tiersten A. Patient Perception of Telehealth Services for Breast and Gynecologic Oncology Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Center Survey-based Study. Journal of Breast Cancer 2020;23(5):542 View
  4. Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Bahaadinbeigy K. The most used questionnaires for evaluating telemedicine services. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2021;21(1) View
  5. Picardo E, Baù M, Anatrone C, Mondino A, Surace A, Gallo F, Danese S, Mitidieri M. Oncophone20 study: Patients’ perception of telemedicine in the COVID‐19 pandemic during follow‐up visits for gynecological and breast cancers. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2021;155(3):398 View
  6. Rajendran S, Mohamad Zaini Z, Lim Y, Kallarakkal T, Ramanathan A, Chan S, Goh Y, Tan C, Lim D, Hassan M, Kanapathy J, Pathmanathan D, Chan C, Liew C, Ismail S, Cheong S. Accelerated implementation of teleconsultation services for the monitoring of oral potentially malignant disorders as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Oral Oncology 2022;126:105730 View
  7. Pongiglione B, Carrone F, Angelucci A, Mazziotti G, Compagni A. Patient characteristics associated with the acceptability of teleconsultation: a retrospective study of osteoporotic patients post-COVID-19. BMC Health Services Research 2023;23(1) View
  8. Cheng N, Zhao Y, Li X, He X, Wang A. Translation and validation study of the Chinese version of the service user technology acceptability questionnaire. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing 2023;10(6):100239 View
  9. Kourtesis P, Kouklari E, Roussos P, Mantas V, Papanikolaou K, Skaloumbakas C, Pehlivanidis A. Virtual Reality Training of Social Skills in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Examination of Acceptability, Usability, User Experience, Social Skills, and Executive Functions. Behavioral Sciences 2023;13(4):336 View
  10. Beyeler M, Légeret C, Kiwitz F, van der Horst K. Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e47913 View
  11. Holmen H, Holm A, Kilvær T, Ljoså T, Granan L, Ekholdt C, Larsen L, Fosse E. Digital Outpatient Services for Adults: Development of an Intervention and Protocol for a Multicenter Non–Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e46649 View
  12. Berg I, Tveter A, Bakland G, Hakim S, Kristianslund E, Lillegraven S, Macfarlane G, Moholt E, Provan S, Sexton J, Thomassen E, De Thurah A, Gossec L, Haavardsholm E, Østerås N. Follow-Up of Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis in Specialist Health Care With Remote Monitoring and Self-Monitoring Compared With Regular Face-to-Face Follow-Up Visits (the ReMonit Study): Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled Open-Label Noninferiority Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e52872 View
  13. Torbjørnsen A, Spildo I, Mollestad M, Jensen A, Singstad T, Weldingh N, Joranger P, Ribu L, Holmen H. Investigating Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patient-Centered Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Protocol for a Multimethod Prospective Observational Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2024;13:e52766 View
  14. Dolničar V, Petrovčič A, Škafar M, Laznik J, Prevodnik K, Hvalič-Touzery S. Determinants of the intention to use mHealth in the future: Evidence from an intervention study of patients with chronic diseases in Slovenia. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2024;190:105537 View
  15. Cox E, Kiwan M, de Medeiros C, Chen-Lai J, Cassiani C, Tseng J, Johnston K, Timmons B, Stinson J, Bouffet E, Mabbott D. A web-based resource for exercise training in children treated for brain tumours to improve cognitive sequelae: Development and usability. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  16. E Leão1 M, S Nohara1 S, C Fleury1 A, R Jardim1,2 J. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire for use in Brazil. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia 2024:e20240030 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Chatzikou M. Intelligent Technologies for Healthcare Business Applications. View